Changing Course, Apple Offers Low-Priced Mac for the HomeSay it ain't so. My gosh. How can they do that and still make money? Lordy, lordy.
By JOHN MARKOFF and SAUL HANSELL
SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 11 - Apple Computer introduced its first low-priced Macintosh on Tuesday, signaling its bet that most consumers now see computers as simply another appliance in the modern house.
While computers have long been sold as machines that can turn a home into an office, most Americans now use them in their bedrooms and kitchens as e-mail terminals; as hubs for playing music, storing and editing photos; and as stations for navigating the Web.
The new Mac Mini, priced as low as $499 without a keyboard, monitor or mouse, is aimed squarely at the needs of this new digital household.
The new Apple strategy, which moves the company deeply into the consumer electronics market, positions the new Macintosh as an entertainment and communication device. It also promises to intensify Apple's battle with Microsoft in the personal computer market dominated by machines using Windows software. (link)
All these computers, because they run on a Microsoft operating system, come with gobs of IBM compatible software. And lots of "memory."
My point is this: Both Apple and the New York Times have been behind the curve for years. In the case of Apple, while every other manufacturer realized back in the 80's that their programming language needed to be standardized, Apple maintained - for too many years - their own operating system that was incompatible with all the other brands - and software offerings - on the market. The only reason they didn't go the way of Commodore and Amiga was because their machines and operating system were - and are - firstrate.
And in the case of the New York Times, well, they are challenged in so many ways ... $499 indeed. And this was front page news.