The Post's campaign to 'Macaca' McDonnell takes a new tackRead the whole thing. The calculated effort on the part of the Post and its "reporter" to distort a story (from long ago) is eye-opening.
By Michael Barone, Senior Political AnalystThe Washington Post Metro page, sputtering in its attempts to “Macaca” Bob McDonnell on the basis of his 1989 Regent University thesis, has shown the “considerable ingenuity” I predicted last week in getting issues related to the McDonnell thesis on the paper’s front page.Today’s front page story by Amy Gardner and its placement by Post editors on the front page is one of the most flagrant examples of electioneering by a paper’s news pages that I have ever seen. “Scrutiny Spreads to ’03 McDonnell Remarks,” the headline proclaims. The subhead reads, “’Homosexual Conduct’ Comments ‘Irrelevant’ to Campaign, He Says.” The obvious message to readers: this candidate thinks it’s all right to penalize people, in some unspecified way, for homosexual conduct.
The blatant purpose of this story is to suggest that McDonnell thinks that homosexuals should not serve as judges. But the fact is that he doesn’t think that. [link]
And they wonder why newspapers are folding around the country.
2 comments:
Great, this fine newspaper cover this like they did the Van Jones story so it should be fine...wait, has this paper even reported the Jones had to resign for past comments? NO! They cannot report the truth anymore. Maybe Bob should have called the dems a--holes. That was not a problem with Jones.
...Al...
"And they wonder why newspapers are foolding around the country." (I noticed the typo but decided to leave it in.) Faster, please.
Post a Comment