Quote

People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it. Welcome to From On High.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Why This Is The Most Influential Blog In Virginia

Remember this weblog post?


It's now been picked up by the mainstream press.  Expect it to go viral from here:
All of Congressman Boucher's SUVs
By David Freddoso, Washington Examiner

When a candidate spends $29,000 from his campaign treasury to buy a sport utility vehicle -- as did Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., last fall -- it tends to draw attention.

It's a perfectly legal but profoundly strange purchase, one his donors likely didn't have in mind. It's also what you'd expect from a congressional campaign that isn't worried about losing and has money to burn.

Boucher is now in a close race -- close enough that he may worry as he rolls about his southwest Virginia district in his new Ford Edge, which the Roanoke Times reports was bought "with a mix of campaign funds and personal money in such a way that he can use it for official, campaign and limited personal business."

But this purchase proves that the time, money and effort it takes to get elected to Congress are all well worth it. In what other job can you get lobbyists, industry groups and special interests to help you buy a top-of-the line automobile?

Or fly you to Vail during ski season?

Boucher's leadership PAC, the Committee for Southwest Virginia, has spent something north of $40,000 this cycle for lodging, catering, airfare and car rental for what appear to be late-winter jaunts to the Westin Riverfront Resort and Spa in Avon, Colo.

There appear to have been two trips, apparently fundraisers, taken in early 2009 and 2010. (Boucher's campaign spokeswoman did not respond to my inquiries in time for publication.)

The combined hotel bill at the Westin is $36,000. Catering from Chef De Cuisine Epicurean Services, the Juniper Restaurant in nearby Edwards, and Vail Catering Concepts, cost $4,100.

Politicians use leadership PACs to expand their power base by doling out money to congressional colleagues and challengers. According to Federal Election Commission records, Boucher's PAC has spent more on Colorado hotel rooms than it has helping his fellow Democrats weather the electoral storms of 2009 and 2010.

Having raised more than $300,000 this cycle, the Committee for Southwest Virginia has given just $9,000 to U.S. House candidates (not counting the $5,000 he gave his own campaign). It also gave $25,500 for Virginia's local and state elections in 2009.

Before 2009, the Committee for Southwest Virginia had never been a political powerhouse. It had never raised more than $61,000 in a single election cycle, and it relied on a handful of corporate PACs to supply nearly the whole amount. You could count its individual contributors on one hand. When it did spend, most (or, as in 2006, all) of the money went to other Democrats.

This changed in early 2009. Boucher, the third-ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, served as the floor manager for an important telecommunications bill. The Committee for Southwest Virginia suddenly came to life and raised five times its previous record.

Employees of DISH Network kicked in $23,000, and the company's PAC contributed $5,000 more, as did the PAC of its rival, DirecTV. Comcast's PAC maxed out with $10,000, as did the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, the Consumer Electronics Association, CenturyLink, Qwest Communications, T-Mobile, AT&T and GoDaddy.com.

The PACs of Sprint, Viacom and Verizon chipped in between $5,000 and $7,500 apiece. Lobbyists from several high-profile firms became first-time donors. When you add it up, that's enough for a whole fleet of SUVs.

A recent Rasmussen poll found that 61 percent of Americans would not run for Congress, even if they thought they could win. They probably just don't know enough about what it's like to be in Congress. [link]
There are so many stories that just came fluttering out of this Pandora's Box.  Not least of which is that which I highlighted three weeks ago about our congressman rubbing elbows with Hollywood celebrities in ski country while his constituents were all back here at home worried about losing their jobs and homes. Partying at fatcat expense, I might remind you.

Another has to do with Boucher's connections to those telecommunications companies.  It's no accident that (a) he chairs the Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet in the House, that he's (b) received a boatload of cash from those same communications companies, that (c) several of those companies have been gracious enough to place call centers (with low wage, poor benefit jobs) in his district, allowing him to (d) claim that he's "created 5,000 jobs" in Southwest Virginia, and (e) you see those TV ads that our congressman is running in which representatives of those same communications companies tell us how essential Rick Boucher is to Southwest Virginia.

It's the age-old "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours."

What it amounts to really, though, is a protections racket, the likes of which would make the Sicilian mafia proud.

Most importantly, this sordid - and often told - story about Washington influence run amok is finding its way into the mainstream media. Finally.

I just wonder: What  are Rick Boucher and his wife's Committee for Southwest Virginia going to do with all that cash after November 2 when he's unemployed?

Like we don't know.

Fun and sun await.

- - -

Bearing Drift has followed up with this: "Rick Boucher's Slush Fund."  Good stuff.

- - -

Glenn Reynolds has this: "Boucher’s defending his seat from a challenge by Morgan Griffith. I don’t know much about him, but he probably doesn’t have a donor-bought SUV.

- - -

Virginia Virtucon: "Are his donors aware of how he’s spending their money?"

James Taranto Agrees With Me

Which means I know I'm in the best of company ...

Here's me yesterday writing about Justice Clarence Thomas's wife leaving a voice message on Anita Hill's answering machine - and Ms. Hill's response:
"But the important point:

"This woman sent that innocuous voice message to the freaking FBI? She felt threatened by a polite request for an apology?

"Is she still in victim mode after all these years?"
Here's Taranto later in the day:
"But why in the Sam Hill would Hill think it is appropriate to waste the FBI's time with an innocuous voice-mail message that clearly violated no law? Those who found her testimony credible back in 1991 look more foolish than ever in light of her latest bizarre behavior."
As you know, I think of James Taranto as the master at this business.  So ...

A Suggestion

How about the Pentagon concentrate on winning the freaking war?

Pentagon trying to change culture to allow gays

For the love of God.  The Democrats have gotten to them.

Kiss Your Quality Health Care Goodbye

A quote from Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen:
Our federal deficit is already at unsustainable levels, and most Americans understand that we can ill afford another entitlement program that adds substantially to it. But our recent health reform has created a situation where there are strong economic incentives for employers to drop health coverage altogether. The consequence will be to drive many more people than projected—and with them, much greater cost—into the reform's federally subsidized system.

The consequence of these generous subsidies will be that America's health reform may well drive many more people than projected out of employer-sponsored insurance and into the heavily subsidized federal system. Perhaps this is a miscalculation by the Congress, perhaps not.
"ObamaCare's Incentive to Drop Insurance," Wall Street Journal, October 21, 2010

- - -

It should be noted that the author, Governor Bredesen, knows something about the weaknesses in government-run health care.  See "Bredesen Scraps TennCare."

Quote of the Day

From Michelle Malkin in "Firing offense: NPR axes Juan Williams for opinions on Muslims & post-9/11 travel":
That’s right. Government-funded NPR has apparently caved into left-wing attack dogs on the Internet.

NPR has undermined whatever credibility it had left with this boneheaded capitulation.

Your tax dollars at work.
As you know, NPR is largely funded by We The People.

Why We The People put up with this flagrant left-wing bias, year after year, is beyond me.

- - -

For today's chuckle see NPR's announcement on the subject, as reported in "Screw Free Speech, NPR Fires Juan Williams for Muslim Remarks":

"NPR said in its statement that the remarks 'were inconsistent with our editorial standards and practices, and undermined his credibility as a news analyst with NPR.'"

"Editorial standards and practices." Translated from the liberaleze, that means those who run NPR had different opinions. Therefore Williams had to be fired. There'll be no diversity in the ranks as long as the open-minded leadership of NPR is in charge.

And we own the damn thing.

While Obama Drives Us Off a Cliff ...

Here:


Everywhere else:

UK unveils dramatic austerity measures

Germany Outlines Tough Budget Cuts

Spain unveils deep budget cuts amid EU economic fears

Irish budget cuts 'could exceed €3bn'

Remember how Bush was criticized for uniting the world ... in opposition to him? That opposition has now actually finally materialized.

Expect Bush to be blamed.