Should they ever be exposed (in fact, it's to Obama's advantage that they not be).
Remember Anita Hill? She became a champion of all persons liberal when she accused Clarence Thomas (another black conservative ,,, hmm) of mentioning a pubic hair being on his Coke can long before.
Oh, the humanity. A pubic hair! Makes the crimes of Josef Mengele pale in comparison, doesn't it?
For that incident she and every other goofball liberal in this country thought Judge Thomas was unqualified to serve in any capacity anywhere for any length of time. Hanging was too good for him.
A casual reference to a pubic hair.
(Make note: This was about the same point in time when Bill Clinton was raping a young woman in a downtown Little Rock hotel. But the same liberals were okay with that because ... well ... liberal future presidents are allowed to do such things. Or maybe it's because Bill Clinton isn't black. Or all black, as opposed to our half-white president.)
Which brings us to Ann Coulter, and back to the "charges" being flung far and wide by the media against Herman Cain. In "Why Our Blacks Are Better Than Their Blacks" she writes:
All we learned was: About a decade ago, as many as two anonymous women accused Cain of making unspecified "inappropriate" remarks and one "inappropriate" gesture in the workplace. (We had more than that on John Edwards' mistress a year into the media's refusal to report that story.)Makes sense to me.
If the details helped liberals, we'd have the details.
To have been accused of sexual harassment in the 1990s is like having been accused of molesting children at preschools in the 1980s or accused of being a witch in Massachusetts in the 1690s.
With no standard other than the subjective offense taken by the accuser, absolutely anyone could be called a witch, i.e., a sexual harasser. So it's striking that the only two conservative public figures accused of being witches both happened to be conservative blacks: Clarence Thomas and Herman Cain.
Meanwhile, MSNBC is cutting into its prime-time programming to announce updates in the fact-free hit on Cain. That's not because anyone there thinks he'll be the nominee. Everyone knows it's going to be Mitt Romney.
But liberals are determined to make sure that, six months from now, everyone has forgotten Herman Cain so they can go back to claiming Republicans oppose Obama because they hate blacks.
Well, actually it makes no sense at all.