People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it. Welcome to From On High.

Thursday, December 29, 2011


What do you as a newspaper editor do if you send an overpaid reporter out - all expenses paid - to do a story and there's no story there?

Run it anyway and pretend there is a story there.

See "Guns in Public, and Out of Sight."

What's it about?

"The New York Times examined the [concealed carry] permit program in North Carolina ... While ... the review ... does not provide answers, it does raise questions."

It raises questions?  Uh, no.  It doesn't.  Other than this one:

How much money did the Times waste on this non-story?

Who'da Thunk It?

A lesson in capitalism: When government tries to influence market forces in a major way, those forces will eventually respond to the pressure and right themselves:

Only four years ago, hundreds of start-ups optimistically built factories and churned out solar panels to meet rising demand. Now, closures and failure loom for many.

So predictable.

There'll be a market for solar power in the future. But it won't be on the scale that Obama and the other morons who watch too many Spielberg movies and read too many Marvel comic books think it is.

Solar companies will thrive or die on their own accord. It's called profit, or loss.

No matter how much socialists want it to be otherwise.


If only you hadn't messed with us:

Chavez: Is U.S. behind bout of cancer?

We aren't sayin'.

But you'd better understand this: You don't quit screwing with us, we'll turn your ass into the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man.

Oops.  Too late.

Be afraid, Hugo.  Be very afraid.

We Owe These People So Much

Without them ...

... this would never have come to pass:
Gun sales at record levels, according to FBI background checks
By Carol Cratty, CNN

December holiday shoppers were not just interested in buying the hottest electronics and toys -- they also were purchasing record numbers of guns, according to the latest FBI figures on background checks required to buy firearms.

With a few days left in December, the FBI reports the number of background checks has already topped the previous one-month record -- set only in November -- of 1,534,414 inquiries by gun dealers to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System also known as NICS. Almost half a million checks were done in just the last six days before Christmas. [link]

Thanks, Barry.  And Harry.  And Bubbles.  Without your active efforts to make us all slaves, this wondrous feat would never have been accomplished.

- - -

It's a phenomenon brought about, in part, by this:

More and more women embracing gun ownership

As my petite little daughter might say:

Weaponry.  The great equalizer.

This Is How We End Up With Romney

The mainstream press knows how to shape the battlefield.

And it does.

One example out of a thousand:

ABC's Karl Jeers 'Disturbing' Gingrich Campaign Video

And their efforts will pay off.

They'll have Romney.

And America will continue down that path to oblivion.

Muslims Against Hatred

Well, certain hatreds anyway.

No, they don't seem to have a problem with fellow Muslims who blow up Catholic churches on Christmas Day or with those who stone women (but not their male partners) for having committed the crime of adultery or with those who plot to kill American women and children.

They have a problem with us:

WaPo Promotes Muslim Comedians Fighting America's 'Fringe' of 'Extreme Haters'

Not sure who those "extreme haters" are here in the USA.

Probably these fellas:

You can bet it ain't these guys though:

Good grief.

Can't Blame The Virginia GOP

As I wrote soon after the controversy erupted, neither Newt Gingrich nor Rick Perry can blame the Republican Party of Virginia for being mean to them.  They both knew the rules, the rules didn't change, and they were applied fairly to all the candidates for president.

Both just screwed up.

As is made clear by a press release coming out of the Virginia GOP this morning:
The Republican Party of Virginia issued the following statement:

From the earliest days of the campaigns, RPV has actively told candidates that Virginia's signature requirements could be a difficult legal requirement to meet for those who were new to Virginia politics.

In October 2011, RPV formally adopted the certification procedures that were applied on December 23: any candidate who submitted over 15,000 facially-valid signatures would be presumed to be in compliance with Virginia's 10,000 signature law.

The presumption of compliance was set at 15,000 for a variety of reasons.

First, in the party's long experience with petitions, RPV has never encountered a situation where a candidate who submitted 15,000 signatures has failed to make the ballot (absent cases of obvious fraud).

Second, Virginia's State Board of Elections advises candidates to collect 15,000 or more signatures to be safe, based on their long experience with average failure rates.

Third, RPV adopted the 15,000-signature presumption because the Party wants all of its candidates to qualify for the ballot. The 15,000-signature presumption served as an incentive for candidates to comply with the law with a safe margin of signatures.

Fourth, under Virginia law, RPV's Chairman is assigned a profound legal obligation to ensure that each candidate has met Virginia's legal requirements. The Party was afforded under Virginia law only 5 days over Christmas to review ballot petitions and signatures. The 15,000-signature presumption was intended to assist the RPV Chairman in meeting his legal obligations in an efficient process that would run quickly while providing the Party and the Commonwealth assurances of legal compliance based upon mathmatical experience.

RPV officials encouraged candidates repeatedly, through both counsel and field staff, to submit 15,000 or more signatures in an abundance of caution, so that they would meet the legal requirements.

Candidates were officially informed of the 15,000 rule in October 2011, well in advance of the Dec. 22 submission deadline. The rule was no surprise to any candidate - and indeed, no candidate or campaign offered any complaints until after the Dec. 23 validation process had concluded.

Despite this early notice and RPV's exhortations to candidates, only one candidate availed himself of the 15,000 signature threshold - Governor Mitt Romney. RPV counted Governor Romney's signatures, reviewed them for facial validity, and determined he submitted well over 15,000. Never in the party's history has a candidate who submitted more than 15,000 signatures had 33 percent invalidated. The party is confident that Governor Romney met the statutory threshold.

Rep. Ron Paul submitted just under 15,000, and was submitted to signature-by-signature scrutiny on the same basis as the other candidates who submitted fewer than 15,000 signatures. After more than 7 hours of work, RPV determined that Rep. Paul had cleared the statutory 10,000/400 signature standard with ease.

Two other candidates did not come close to the 10,000 valid signature threshold. RPV regrets that Speaker Gingrich and Governor Perry did not meet the legal requirements established by the General Assembly. Indeed, our hope was to have a full Republican field on the ballot for Republican voters to consider on March 6.

The party will discuss the specific nature of their shortfalls if necessary. But the failure of these two candidates to meet the state requirements does not call into question the accuracy of the Party's certification of the two candidates who are duly qualified to appear on the ballot.
I hear Rick Perry has filed suit over the matter. Now he'll have a team of lawyers arguing his case before the court. If only he had worked as hard to get his name on the ballot here in the Commonwealth ...