People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it. Welcome to From On High.

Sunday, February 05, 2012

'Journalists' Bring Shame To Their Profession

(Actually I paused when I used the word "profession" in the title.  Because, in the case of the Susan G. Komen for the Cure controversy, most national "journalists," in reality, were seen, to their shame, professing their loyalty to the abortion industry rather than furthering the profession that brings them their riches.)

Ross Douthat, writing in the New York Times (see "The Media's Abortion Blinders") outlines the problem:
Conservative complaints about media bias are sometimes overdrawn. But on the abortion issue, the press's prejudices are often absolute, its biases blatant and its blinders impenetrable. In many newsrooms and television studios across the country, Planned Parenthood is regarded as the equivalent of, well, the Komen foundation: an apolitical, high-minded and humanitarian institution whose work no rational person — and certainly no self-respecting woman — could possibly question or oppose.

But of course millions of Americans — including, yes, millions of American women — do oppose Planned Parenthood. They oppose the 300,000-plus abortions it performs every year (making it the largest abortion provider in the country), and they oppose its tireless opposition to even modest limits on abortion.

Even if some forms of partiality are inevitable, journalists betray their calling when they simply ignore self-evident truths about a story.

Three truths, in particular, should be obvious to everyone reporting on the Komen-Planned Parenthood controversy. First, that the fight against breast cancer is unifying and completely uncontroversial, while the provision of abortion may be the most polarizing issue in the United States today. Second, that it's no more "political" to disassociate oneself from the nation’s largest abortion provider than it is to associate with it in the first place. Third, that for every American who greeted Komen's shift with "anger and outrage" (as Andrea Mitchell put it), there was probably an American who was relieved and gratified.

Indeed, that sense of relief was quantifiable: the day after the controversy broke, Komen reported that its daily donations had risen dramatically.

But of course, you wouldn't know that from most of the media coverage. After all, the people making those donations don't exist.
NBC's Andrea Mitchell, "journalist," mentioned above, in particular, from the days of the Clarence Thomas hearings two decades ago, has worn her radical feminism on her sleeve on air for all the world to witness.  And abhor.  Yet she remains.  In her circle of friends her advocacy is no doubt appreciated and admired.  But in the real world she's seen as being just another boneheaded radical feminist who brings shame to her profession.

People like Andrea Mitchell, along with all the other "journalists" who make no bones about which side of the Planned Parenthood controversy they are on, look down upon us bloggers as being a bunch of partisan, no-account boobs.  But from up here, looking down on the shit their kind call journalism, the air is mighty refined by comparison.