A judge has ruled that a man who claimed he was assaulted, choked and roughed up by a Muslim because the assaulted man was perceived as having imprecated the prophet Mohammed deserved to be assaulted, choked and roughed up because of his having blasphemed. Case dismissed.
Riyadh? Medina? Mecca?
Pennsylvania.
Here's something this stupid, stupid judge might want to read:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.Source.
It's assumed this judge went to Islam school. Did he not attend law school? If so, was it a law school in this country?
For the love of God.
4 comments:
There you go again with that there Constitution thang, Jerry. Judgie answers to a higher law--Sharia. Just like that other phony judge in, I believe, New Jersey who ruled a Believer had the right to sexually assault his wife under Allah's Law. The Brits have already granted Muslims the right to rule their little enclaves under Sharia. Surely, we'll be right behind. Not so far fetched, when you look at CAIR's power to get Homeland Security to cower.
Call me old-fashioned.
Noting that almost everyone is repeating this, it is unfortunate you did. None of it is true.
There was no assault or 'roughing up', the cops checked into the accusations and made the charge of "harassment". The guy marching side-by-side with the alleged victim didn't see anything.
The judge is not a Muslim and didn't say he was one; he's a long-time Lutheran.
The case was dismissed because the alleged victim was and is a serial liar. He has been unable to prove anything he claims, and everything he has claimed that can be checked turns out not to be true.
Perhaps this district court judge isn't a perfect statesman, but he made the right call. I'm disappointed in self-labeled conservatives for jumping on this the way they have.
Dude, listen to the tape of the court proceeding. This judge went way beyond adjudicating the circumstances of the case before him.
Post a Comment