The New York Times attacks the current Supreme Court for abandoning judicial restraint and “signaling its willingness to replace law made by Congress,” then turns around less than a month later to attack Judge Bork for advocating judicial restraint and saying that “the court must defer to the will of the majority.”Did you consider the alternative? Maybe the members of the New York Times editorial board just ain't all that bright.
Shouldn’t the Times’ editorial board try a little harder to avoid openly contradicting itself like that?
Monday, April 30, 2012
Quote of the Day
From Damon W. Root:
Posted by Jerry Fuhrman at 6:43 AM