Tuesday, February 09, 2010,6:01 AM
Adverb Police!
From a silly Roanoke Times editorial ("An Incentive to Go Green") having to do with America's most pressing crisis, the magnitude of which threatens to overwhelm the economic crisis and the Iran crisis and the federal deficit crisis, the plastic grocery bag crisis:

"Next time you stroll along the banks of the Roanoke or New rivers, keep an eye on the shores and trees. It will not take long to spot white and tan bags clinging wetly to rocks and branches."

Wetly?  The bags clung wetly?  From which dictionary did that word spring?

Probably the same one that listed macaca ("a pejorative epithet used by francophone colonialists in Central Africa's Belgian Congo for the native population") as a word.  These guys were big massagers of that one too.

Wetly.  Good grief.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 7 comments
,5:47 AM
Forward Thinking
It appears that they haven't quite figured out how to get goods from Point A to Point B yet, but they're working on it.  And this seems promising - if only because there have been no solutions proposed that will destroy commerce along I-81.  I'm encouraged.

The news:
Rail could be answer to I-81 gridlock, report says
By Jeff Sturgeon, The Roanoke Times

Virginia could eliminate about one in three trucks from Interstate 81 with extensive --and expensive -- rail improvements, a consultant says.

Given the high cost and logistical barriers to such a plan, however, the consultant endorses a more modest approach that will shift fewer trucks -- perhaps one in seven -- much to the disappointment of some railroad supporters.

Three years in the making at a cost of $75,000, the December report from consultant Cambridge Systematics recommends Virginia stick to its present plan to address truck congestion on I-81: funding the Crescent Corridor.

The Crescent Corridor is a proposed new intermodal rail service under which Norfolk Southern Corp. intends to expand its rail system to better compete with, and integrate with, highway trucking.

The corridor is designed to link the southern freight hubs of New Orleans and Memphis, Tenn., with those in New Jersey. [link]
I-81 congestion is a real issue.  One that must be addressed.

But a few of the suggestions that have been put forward to ameliorate the situation have either been pie-in-the-sky nonsense or will prove to be detrimental to our struggling economy.  Making the interstate a toll road to keep vehicles off of it is one of the latter.  Hi-speed passenger train service is one of the former.

Here's to the planners.  It looks like they're ... on ... the ... right ... track.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,4:55 AM
The Gov't Is Setting Up a Global Warming Office
Its launch had to be postponed because of frigid temperatures and a debilitating snow accumulation.

For the love of God.  How long do we have to put up with these nitwits?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 4 comments
,4:36 AM
This Has To Hurt
There are few conservative politicians that are/were more despised by the left than Dick Cheney.  Sarah Palin comes to mind (see next post).  That being the case, this has to be really upsetting to them.

Cheney was right all along:
Cheney's Revenge
The Obama Administration is vindicating Bush antiterror policy.
Wall Street Journal editorial

Dick Cheney is not the most popular of politicians, but when he offered a harsh assessment of the Obama Administration's approach to terrorism last May, his criticism stung—so much that the President gave a speech the same day that was widely seen as a direct response. Though neither man would admit it, eight months later political and security realities are forcing Mr. Obama's antiterror policies ever-closer to the former Vice President's.

In fact, the President's changes in antiterror policy have never been as dramatic as he or his critics have advertised. His supporters on the left have repeatedly howled when the Justice Department quietly went to court and offered the same legal arguments the Bush Administration made, among them that the President has the power to detain enemy combatants indefinitely without charge. He has also ramped up drone strikes against al Qaeda and Taliban operatives in Pakistan.

However, the Administration has tried to break from its predecessors on several big antiterror issues, and it is on those that it is suffering the humiliation of having to walk back from its own righteous declarations. This is Dick Cheney's revenge.

Begin with Mr. Obama's executive order, two days after his inauguration, to shut the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay within one year. [link]
Read the whole thing.  The money quote:

"As long as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were responsible for keeping Americans safe, Democrats could pander to the U.S. and European left's anti-antiterror views at little political cost. But now that they are responsible, American voters are able to see what the left really has in mind, and they are saying loud and clear that they prefer the Cheney method."

Bush and Cheney were right.  The whimpering lefties were all wrong.  As we've been saying all along.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,4:26 AM
Why Do They Hate Her So?
I can understand why they would disagree.  I can even understand how it is that they look down upon her education, upbringing, and family values.  But such hatred is beyond explanation:
Matthews Attacks Palin for 12 Minutes: 'Can a Palm Reader be President?' 'Is She a Balloon Head?'
By Noel Sheppard, NewsBusters

Chris Matthews Monday went on a twelve minute attack on former Alaska governor Sarah Palin that should make his fellow MSNBCers and the liberal blogosphere quite happy.

Here's how Monday's "Hardball" began:

"Can a palm reader be president? What do we think of kids in school who write stuff on their hands to get through a test? What do we think of a would-be political leader who does it to look like she`s speaking without notes? What do we think of Sarah Palin this weekend answering pre-screened questions from a like-minded audience in Nashville, a tea party convention, and still having to put a cheat sheet on her palm to answer what she calls the basics of her beliefs? How can someone presume to be auditioning for president when they can`t even answer questions they know are coming?"

And that was just the teaser! Readers are strongly cautioned to prepare themselves for a level of vitriol and invective normally only spewed on television by Matthews' colleague Keith Olbermann. [link]
That which they fear they must destroy?

This from the guy who routinely says WE'RE full of hate.

- - -

There are those who explain the condescension and hatred by pointing out the Liberal Conceit.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
Monday, February 08, 2010,6:15 AM
It Gets Comical
Now "Native Americans" are upset over the proposed wind farm out in the ocean off Nantucket.

Too funny.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:10 AM
Space Shuttle Blasts Off
Mission unclear.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,6:08 AM
It's a Little Late, Fellas
I have no patience anymore for fools.  And speaking of those who work on Wall Street:
Irked, Wall St. Hedges Its Bet on Democrats
By David D. Kirkpatrick, New York Times

Washington — If the Democratic Party has a stronghold on Wall Street, it is JPMorgan Chase.

Its chief executive, Jamie Dimon, is a friend of President Obama’s from Chicago, a frequent White House guest and a big Democratic donor. Its vice chairman, William M. Daley, a former Clinton administration cabinet official and Obama transition adviser, comes from Chicago’s Democratic dynasty.

But this year Chase’s political action committee is sending the Democrats a pointed message. While it has contributed to some individual Democrats and state organizations, it has rebuffed solicitations from the national Democratic House and Senate campaign committees. Instead, it gave $30,000 to their Republican counterparts.

The shift reflects the hard political edge to the industry’s campaign to thwart Mr. Obama’s proposals for tighter financial regulations. [link]
Somehow these geniuses thought candidate Obama was going to be good for business and banking.  What part of "I am going to redistribute wealth" didn't they understand?

I think they deserve what they're getting.  Almost.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,5:30 AM
Rejoice
Liberal Democrat Arlen Specter has been renominated to his Senate position:
Specter wins party nod, but not hearts
By David Catanese, Politico

Lancaster, Pa. — Even as he accepted the resounding backing of the Pennsylvania Democratic state committee here Saturday, party-switching Sen. Arlen Specter’s vulnerability was on vivid display as he botched the name of a key Democratic officeholder in his acceptance speech.

On Friday evening — as Gov. Ed Rendell stood on stage alongside Specter, Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and a beaming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) — to celebrate the governor’s accomplishments and laud Specter’s role in helping pass the $787 billion economic stimulus package last winter ... [link]
Specter and Pelosi on the same stage.  A match made in heaven.

The GOP is so much the better for this arrangement.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,5:22 AM
It Was All a Lie
That "consensus" that Al Gore likes to tout?  It's all based on a massive fabrication:
New errors in IPCC climate change report
By Richard Gray and Ben Leach, London Telegraph

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) report is supposed to be the world’s most authoritative scientific account of the scale of global warming.

But this paper has discovered a series of new flaws in it including:

* The publication of inaccurate data on the potential of wave power to produce electricity around the world, which was wrongly attributed to the website of a commercial wave-energy company.

* Claims based on information in press releases and newsletters.

* New examples of statements based on student dissertations, two of which were unpublished.

* More claims which were based on reports produced by environmental pressure groups.

* They are the latest in a series of damaging revelations about the IPCC’s most recent report, published in 2007. [link]
Never forget this:  The left was prepared - eager - to tax us into oblivion over this.

For the love of God.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,4:47 AM
And Let's Not Forget The Enablers
The media:
House of Peers
By Mark Steyn, National Review

As Jonah [Goldberg] and I have written here previously, "climate change" is not only a scientific scandal but also a massive journalistic failure. While the "Canadian Journalism Project" continues to insist that dissenting from the orthodoxy is "irresponsible journalism", Matt Ridley at The Spectator acknowledges the reality:

"Journalists are wont to moan that the slow death of newspapers will mean a disastrous loss of investigative reporting. The web is all very well, they say, but who will pay for the tenacious sniffing newshounds to flush out the real story? ‘Climategate’ proves the opposite to be true. It was amateur bloggers who scented the exaggerations, distortions and corruptions in the climate establishment; whereas newspaper reporters, even after the scandal broke, played poodle to their sources."

Mr Ridley credits various British, Canadian and American bloggers, and then makes this observation:

"Notice that all of these sceptic bloggers are self-employed businessmen. Their strengths are networks and feedback: mistakes get quickly corrected; new leads are opened up; expertise is shared; links are made."

The correcting mechanisms of competitive businesses are largely alien to America's unreadable monodailies, which is why they'll be extinct long before the polar bear. [link]
I think it's a matter of laziness as much as it is the urge to look the other way.  A new generation of journalists has learned to gather information from their email in-boxes and from the fax machine.  Whoever sends over the juiciest stuff - whether grounded in truth or not - gets published.

It didn't used to be this way.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Sunday, February 07, 2010,7:16 AM
Whiplash
The Roanoke Times editorialists this morning - in an effort to feel good about themselves - hop on their high horse once again to whine about the discrimination that is directed toward gay Virginians.  Which is fine.

Tiresome.  But fine.  It's their ink (and bytes).  They can whine all they want.

See "The Easy Bigotry of Inaction."

Here's the only part of this tedious editorial I'll make mention of:
The overt oppression of the majority manifested most plainly a few years ago when voters wrote discrimination into the commonwealth's constitution. They forbade the state from granting or recognizing same-sex marriages.

More pernicious is the easy bigotry of inaction. Because most people are unaffected by laws that discriminate against gays and lesbians, they perceive no pressing need to fix them. They allow Virginia's leaders to eschew change in favor of comfortable discrimination wrapped in notions of tradition and faith.
Translated: Most Virginians - "the majority" - actively codified into Virginia law the fact that marriage is between a man and a woman, and most Virginians - "most people" - are doing nothing to end the discrimination - the inaction thing - that they actively worked to codify.

Huh?

Are we inactive or active?  I'm confused.

Get the impression these guys are still pissed that the people of Virginia were allowed to actively participate in the formulation of our laws through the amendment process?  It's worth remembering that only 43% of us believed that an amendment to the Virginia constitution banning gay marriage was a bad idea.  A sizable majority - 57% - actively voted it into law.

So shut up with the inaction stuff.  We were active.  They and their kind just don't like what we did.

Here's the way I read this editorial.  The elitists at the Times want a small handful of judges to get active and do what the people of Virginia refuse to do - give homosexuals the right to marry each other.  In other words, to declare part of the Virginia constitution unconstitutional (don't laugh; a few tottering old liberal judges in Nevada declared that state's constitution to be in violation of that state's constitution in 2003).  The boys at the Times don't care if you're inactive - in fact, truth be known, they'd prefer it that way.  They want the courts to be active.

Here's the bottom line:  We the people of Virginia actively chose to ban gay marriage.  Forever.  We'll not revisit that decision.  Whine all you want.

- - -

Precedent!  Precedent!  Odd how that was important to the editorialists just days ago when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned existing law that had to do with campaign finance but isn't mentioned now that they want Virginia law overturned.

Odd indeed.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,6:24 AM
Dems In Bigger Trouble Than We Thought
There are a few moderate politicians in the Democratic Party.  A few.  Included in that small handful is one Evan Bayh.  I thought.

It appears, though, that the people of Indiana don't agree.  They see him more of an Obama.  Which spells doom for the coolest head in an otherwise hot-headed - and loony - political party:
Bayh a tough sell in Indiana
By Donald Lambro, Washington Times

If you want more evidence of how deep Democratic losses may be in the fall midterm elections, Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh's suddenly shaky bid for a third term is Exhibit A.

A few months ago, Mr. Bayh was considered a shoo-in for re-election in the Hoosier state. Now election handicappers have moved him from "safe" to endangered.

Despite Mr. Bayh's once carefully cultivated image as a party moderate, he has lurched left under the rhetorical spell of the Obama presidency and the pressures of the Senate's liberal Democratic caucus.

He voted for the $2.5 trillion Obamacare bill despite strong opposition back home, where polls showed 60 percent opposition. He backed President Obama's $800-billion-plus stimulus bill, which has failed to create the 3.5 million jobs Mr. Obama promised. He supported Mr. Obama's unpopular move to remove terrorist prisoners from Guantanamo Bay and try them in civilian courts.

This was not the sensible, moderate Evan Bayh who once chaired the centrist-leaning Democratic Leadership Council that declared war on the liberal wing of his party. He broke with his state's right-of-center political traditions, and Indiana voters are breaking away from him. [link]
Ouch.  If a moderate Democrat can't win, what's the hope for all those radically liberal Democrats out there?

November could bring election results like this country has never seen before.

There is hope for America ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:44 AM
You Were Warned
The man's biography, sketchy as it was, demonstrated no leadership skills whatsoever.  And lo and behold, it turns out that Obama has no leadership skills now that he's commander-in-chief.  Who knew?
Democrats chafe as White House wavers on health care bill
By Carrie Budoff Brown, Politico

President Barack Obama has left Democrats as confused as ever about how the White House plans to deliver a health care reform bill this year, after two weeks of inconsistent statements, negligible hands-on involvement and a sudden shift to a jobs-first message.

Democrats on Capitol Hill and beyond say they have no clear understanding of the White House strategy — or even whether there is one — and are growing impatient with Obama’s reluctance to guide them toward a legislative solution.

And some Democrats feel that every time they look to White House for clarity, they hear something different, as though the strategy is whatever the president or his top advisers said that day.

In the past two weeks, since Democrats lost the Massachusetts Senate race, Obama or his top advisers have suggested all of the following: breaking the bill into smaller parts, keeping it together in one comprehensive package, putting it at the back of legislative line and needing to “punch it through” Congress, as Obama himself said Tuesday.

“I’m not sure where the White House is right now,” said Ralph G. Neas, a longtime progressive activist who is now the head of the National Coalition on Health Care. “But I do believe that given everything that has happened, the time has come for more forceful presidential leadership. That is the only way to close the deal. That kind of leadership involves providing more precise guidance to Congress and a clear case to the American people on how this benefits families. The president must step up and wield the power of his office.” [link]
Now that we've gotten to know this guy (something his handlers desperately tried to prevent during the election run), do the words "forceful" and "powerful" describe Obama?  We all know now that he isn't either.  In fact, he's not even a consensus builder.  He's a public speaker with a good jump shot.

So the Democrats look to their small forward for leadership.  And in response he preens.  And gives more teleprompted speeches.  And works to perfect his three-pointer.

As a thought exercise, compare the attributes Obama exemplifies with those made famous by Lyndon Johnson (say what you will about the guy, he got things done).  One was a leader in every sense of the word.  The other ... has great ball-handling abilities.  And enunciation skills that we should all envy.

In these troubled times shouldn't we expect more from the leader of the free world?

Many Democrats are now saying yes.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:08 AM
Headline Of The Day
From Ann Althouse:


Somehow the two caricatures work simultaneously for those who hate her.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 6 comments
Saturday, February 06, 2010,2:18 PM
A Matter Of Perspective
As I was on the phone this morning fussing about the added burden that two massive snowfalls brings to our daily routine, my daughter reminded me to think about how pretty a snowy landscape can be.  And she's right.  It's the stuff that Thomas Kincaid paintings are made of:

 


If only it weren't such a pain in the tush to deal with ...

Click on the image to enlarge it.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 5 comments
,2:09 PM
Here's Something You Didn't Know
Did you know that deer chew cud the same way cows do?

This is a photo of a doe laying quite contentedly just behind my home, chewing its cud and lazing after having devoured a couple of Paula's shrubs that are were growing next to the house.


Happy little bugger, eh?  Seems to like euonymous the best.  My favorite too when I'm starving to death.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,2:02 PM
OK. We Have Enough Snow.
I don't know if you can make out the detail in this photo but it's shot from inside my barn looking out through a standard height doorway. The view of the landscape is blocked by a pile of snow just outside that stands close to five feet tall - and growing as each day goes by:


Yeah, we've got enough snow already.

Another look from outside:

 

My calculations tell me that this snow will have completely melted away sometime in July.

Click on the images to enlarge them.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:57 AM
Seeing What They Want To See
I almost feel sorry for New York Times columnist Charles Blow.  Why would he embarrass himself like this:
Where has this Obama been?

Since the State of the Union address, the president has been bounding about, displaying a new sense of vigor and confidence and a fighter’s spirit. He almost looks like the president people thought that he would be — a paladin, not a pacifist.
Obviously Mr. Blow has been too busy of late writing silly stuff like that to actually pick up a newspaper.  Had he he would have seen these headlines:



Congressional Dems Angry At Obama For Voting "Present" on Reform


And from Blow's own New York Times:


The State of the Union Is Comatose


And then there's this:
Lost in Translation

He’s still stuck on studious.

He seems to believe that if he does a better job of explaining his aggressive agenda, then he’ll win hearts and minds. It’s an honorable ambition, but it’s foolhardy. People want clear goals, clearly defined and clearly (and concisely) conveyed. They’re suspicious of complexity.

Republicans know this well. Obama knows it not.
That, so you know, was written by Charles Blow of the New York Times a week ago.

A lot must have changed in a few days, eh, Charles?

Or is this wishful thinking?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:45 AM
The GOP Deserves This
The ultra-liberal Roanoke Times editorial team takes a swipe at a Republican senator who still hasn't learned one blessed thing from the election results obtained in 2006 or 2008, or from the surging Tea Party movement of today.  Earth to Alabama Senator Richard Shelby!
The audacity of nope

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., has been holding up a bunch of President Obama's nominees - according to some reports going so far as to take the unprecedented step of putting a hold on every single one. Why such a stunning level of obstructionism, even from the Republican Party, which has taken obstructionism to unheard of heights?

Shelby is upset because Obama blocked spending for a couple of multimillion earmarks he got passed.

That's right: A Republican senator is holding up Obama's nominees as part of a hissy fit over canceled pork barrel projects for Alabama. What incredible pettiness.

The audacity of nope reaches new heights. [link]
"What incredible pettiness" is an odd response.  The Times, which has generally been on the right side of the continuing Congressional earmark scandal (an outrage that lives on despite Obama's promise to end the practice), should have stuck to the waste and greed angles.  Pettiness, after all, is what Congress - and the president, for that matter - are into these days. If Shelby were being petty here, he'd fit right in with the rest of the easily piqued prima donnas in the Magic Kingdom. 

But to the point: Shelby represents everything that is wrong with the Republican Party.  The one that now finds itself in a woefully tiny minority in Washington.  The party that took such drubbings in the last two national election years because it had as its standard bearers snakes like Shelby.

The man was once a proud Democrat.  Maybe it's time he went back where he fits in.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:22 AM
What Will You Be Doing Tomorrow?
Digging out from the storm, I'd bet.  And trying to make your way down to Wal-Mart to get some bread and milk.

Your congressman here in Southwest Virginia?  He'll be livin' large.  Watching the Super Bowl at the White House with his boss.

We understand and encourage it.

Now, where's that snow plow ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,6:04 AM
On 'Climate Change'
I still think, once enough scientific data are gathered, that it will turn out to be the case that cosmic rays have more to do with fluctuations in global temperature than does human activity.  Far more.

Maybe some day scientists will look into this.  And stop making studies up from whole cloth.

Call me a dreamer.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:24 AM
A Question Regarding Those Unemployment Numbers
You saw yesterday the announcement that the percentage of Americans who are unemployed dropped from 10.0 to 9.7?  That's good.  But ... It turns out that 20,000 additional Americans were thrown out of work last month.  More layoffs brought the unemployment rate down?

Well, no.  It turns out that somewhere around a third of a million people simply quit looking.  They don't factor into the equation.  They're unemployed but not unemployed; they're now asterisks.

My question is this:

If people in large numbers continue to drop out of the labor force, and the unemployment percentage works its way down to zero, are we at full employment when nobody is employed?

"The Obama administration today announced the latest unemployment figure.  It's 0%, down from 0.2% last month.  With 234 million Americans having now given up looking for work."

I'm having real trouble with this statistic.

- - -

Looks like I'm not alone in being confused by those seemingly incongruous numbers.  From the Wall Street Journal ("European Indexes Slammed Again"):
The fiscal woes of Europe's so-called peripheral economies—Greece, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and Italy—have sparked intense worry in recent days about a possible debt default or need for a bailout by stronger European nations.

Markets got a brief break from the selling after the U.S. Labor Department reported that the U.S. unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 9.7%, but investors were ultimately confused by the figures, which also showed that the world's largest economy continued shedding jobs in January.[my emphasis] [link requires subscription]
I understand the need for the jobs reporting such as it is, but it still leaves a big hole in the data.  Someday some really smart person is going to figure this out ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,5:12 AM
There Have Been Times ...
How would federal marshals react to this, I wonder:
What to do on an airplane when you find yourself seated next to a real jerk

1. Take out your laptop.
2. Slowly open your laptop.
3. Turn it on.
4. Make certain your neighbor is watching.
5. Open your internet browser.
6. Close your eyes for a few moments, open them and then look up to the sky, or the heavens if you will.
7. Breathe deeply and open this site.

8. Look at the expression on your neighbor's face.
As much as you might want to do it sometimes, don't.  The flight attendants will freak.  And then there's that nasty prison thing.

Still ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:06 AM
Why The Cry of 'Racist!' Has Become Such a Joke
It mostly has to do with the fact that those usually screaming the loudest are utter buffoons.  And utter racists themselves:
Conyers wants Haiti relief official demoted over diversity deficit
By Molly K. Hooper, The Hill

Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) has called on Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to demote the official coordinating Haiti relief efforts for not having enough minority staffers.

The House Judiciary Committee Chairman sent a letter to Clinton on Thursday after Rajiv Shah, administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, showed up at a meeting with the 42-member Congressional Black Caucus without any African American staffers in tow.

“I was alarmed and chagrined to learn that none of the approximately dozen staff he brought with him were African American,” Conyers wrote in the letter. “This is so serious an error in judgment that it warrants his immediate demotion to a subordinate position at AID.” [link]
Alarmed and chagrined.  I have to tell you, I'm alarmed and chagrined every time this idiot gets reelected by the people of Detroit.   I don't know if the republic can withstand it.

Can you imagine?  Conyers sees a group of bureaucrats file into chambers and the first thing he looks at is skin color.  Who's the racist, there, Jack?

And can we be honest?  I look at all the grief that MSNBC bed-wetter Chris Matthews is having to endure for his having said, in a fit of orgasmic delirium, with regard to Obama's utterly forgettable State of the Union speech the other night, "I forgot he was black for an hour," and rejoice that he - Matthews - is actually making progress.  A whole hour?  Good boy.

For most normal people, we can easily go for months without noticing or making mention of skin color.  Months.  Unless some race-consumed leftist brings it up.  A la Conyers.  

That's even the case with Obama.  What do I see when I look at him?  Ears.  Big, protruding, floppy ears, with a head attached.  And a pencil neck.  But not skin hue.  Sorry. 


So, as Matthews will now attest, we make progress.  Progress that will accelerate when fossilized racists like John Conyers have all gone to that separate-but-equal place in the sky. 

- - -

Michelle Malkin declares Conyers to be "Race Hustler of the Week."

 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,4:44 AM
Strike While The Iron Is Hot
Seeing the United Nations being lambasted from all sides these days over the ever-mushrooming Climategate scandal (the latest), I have to pose a question to all concerned Americans:

Wouldn't now be the optimum time to ask Obama to get the U.S. the hell out of the U.N.?

Seems like the perfect occasion to me.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Friday, February 05, 2010,8:09 AM
Now We're Talkin'
Good news out of northeast Virginia:
Permits approved for $6B power plant in rural Va 
Associated Press

Surry, Va. (AP) -- The Surry County Board of Supervisors has approved permits that could bring the state's largest coal-fueled power plant there.

The board Thursday unanimously approved permits for about 350 acres outside Dendron, where Old Dominion Electric Cooperative plans to build the $6 billion, 1,500-megawatt Cypress Creek Power Station. While most of the project will be in Dendron, a fly-ash landfill and water-intake facility would be built in the county.

Cooperative spokesman Jeb Hockman says the vote allows federal and state environmental agencies to start testing the site.

Opponents say the plant's emissions would harm the environment and people's health. Supporters say the area needs new jobs and tax revenue. [link]
And those opponents are the same morons who will tell you we're experiencing global warming, so put their opinions where they belong.
 
Me?  I'm for new jobs.  And for the added tax revenue.  But more than anything else, I'm for increasing the availability of energy.  

Now if they could just do something to drive down the price of electricity ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,8:05 AM
As The Snow Falls ... Again ...
... and temperatures continue to come in below normal on a daily basis, it might be worth taking a moment to reflect on those who still believe the planet is WARMING, including, God love 'em, our two adorable but deluded congresspersons here in Southwest and Southside Virginia - Rick Boucher (D-9) and Tom Perriello (D-5):




A couple of screen captures for those who don't want to view the entire spanking:

 

  

  

  

Exquisite.

Memo to Perriello and Boucher: Don't think for a minute that we are going to forget your traitorous votes on John Kerry's ruinous cap-and-trade bill.  Not for a minute.  We will hound you until you are sent back to the nether regions from which both of you came.  That's how wrong you were on this, and how deep-rooted our disdain for your sellout to the environmentalists runs.

Video produced and distributed by the Republican Party of Virginia.


 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,7:56 AM
My God
There will be those who will see that the unemployment rate fell from 10% to 9.7% last month and see good times ahead.  Me?  I think that that is good news.  But I turn to the New York Times this morning for the rest of the story:

(1)  "The United States economy shed 20,000 [more] jobs in January."

(2)  "The overall toll of the recession ... grew larger: 8.4 million jobs have been lost since December 2007, the government said, nearly one million more than previously recorded."

Has the recession really bottomed out?  Nobody seems to know.  And that in itself is cause for concern.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,7:34 AM
And They Said Bush Was Stupid
I'll bet he at least knew how to pronounce the various ranks that the Navy and Marine Corps entitles.

Uh, make that Marine Corpse.  Obama's new pronunciation.

See "Obama Mispronounces 'Corpsman' At Prayer Breakfast."

He must have missed that class because he was shoving cocaine up his nose.

Corpse-man.  Too funny.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,7:25 AM
These Guys Crack Me Up
Bush Derangement Syndrome lives!  It's just been channeled in a different direction, toward a different enemy:
Records: Palin cabins not noted in tax assessments
By Rachel D'Oro, Associated Press Writer

Anchorage, Alaska – Records show that Sarah Palin hasn't paid any property taxes on cabins that have been built on two backcountry plots partially owned by the former Alaska governor.

There are no tax assessments for the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna spotted Thursday in an aerial survey. Property taxes totaling $156.13 were paid on the land in 2009 — but that bill did not include anything for the structures because the local assessor didn't know about the new construction nearly 100 miles north of Anchorage.

The issue has attracted the attention of local tax officials who conducted the scheduled aerial survey of properties in the area on Thursday. The area is accessible only by floatplane, snowmobile or four-wheeler.

Dave Dunivan, the assessor for the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, said such a survey had not been done there in five years, before construction started on the cabins. [link]
What?!  Sarah Palin hasn't paid the property taxes she owes?

Well, no.  Not even.

If you read the details carefully - after the knife is removed from Palin's back ("Records show that Sarah Palin hasn't paid any property taxes on ...") -  you'll understand that the Borough assessor hasn't updated his records with a routine inspection of the property that is at the center of this faux conflagration.  Quite simply the assessed value of the property hasn't changed.  Yet.  And it won't until the borough (in many states, the county) assessor does his thing.  When the assessor makes his way out to her cabin location, makes note of the improvements to the land, appraises those improvements in the normal manner, the assessed value of the property will be adjusted (her land value might actually decrease if Alaska property values are going the way of Las Vegas property values these days; ever think of that?  She might be getting screwed by not having a reassessment performed.)

Before anyone tries to make the point that what this "reporter" reported is accurate, I'll concede the point.  When she wrote, "Records show that Sarah Palin hasn't paid any property taxes on cabins that have been built on two backcountry plots partially owned by the former Alaska governor," she's not wrong.  Taxes have not been paid.   

Nor were they owed.

For the love of God, these people need to get therapy.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,7:05 AM
Quote of the Day
From Charles Krauthammer:
A year later, after stunning Democratic setbacks in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts, Obama gave a stay-the-course State of the Union address (a) pledging not to walk away from health-care reform, (b) seeking to turn college education increasingly into a federal entitlement, and (c) asking again for cap-and-trade energy legislation. Plus, of course, another stimulus package, this time renamed a "jobs bill."

This being a democracy, don't the Democrats see that clinging to this agenda will march them over a cliff? Don't they understand Massachusetts?

Well, they understand it through a prism of two cherished axioms: (1) The people are stupid and (2) Republicans are bad. Result? The dim, led by the malicious, vote incorrectly. 
He's always so right.  What is it about Krauthammer?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:54 AM
Expect a Lot More Of This
Contrition?
Embarrassment?
Angst? 
All of the above?

I expect, as global warming theory continues to crumble, to read a whole lot of "I've been had" op/eds.  Like this one:
May Cooler Heads Prevail
By A. Kam Napier, Honolulu Magazine

I feel I’ve been had.

I grew up admiring science and scientists. One of my favorite TV shows as a kid? Carl Sagan’s Cosmos. I took global warming seriously because I took scientists seriously and forgot that they are people, too, no less prone to vanity, piety or hubris than others. When I read about the CRU e-mails, a scandal now known as Climategate, I felt anger and disappointment, some of it directed at myself.

People make these kinds of mistakes all the time, and the motives are no mystery. For the researchers, grant dollars and reputations are on the line. For reporters, global warming offers the thrill of covering The Biggest Story Ever Told, an appeal I could not resist. For politicians, it has offered an endless opportunity for grandstanding and power grabs. Convinced they are saving the earth—what could be more rewarding or important?—all three groups helped each other lose their minds.

It’s time for scientists to do what science is all about: check their work to see if the results can be reproduced. Fresh eyes need to look at the original data the CRU used, to see if they can independently find the same evidence for warming. But wait—that can’t be done. Somehow, the CRU managed to “lose” all its original data.

How’s that for an inconvenient truth? [link]
An even greater inconvenient truth?  We are only now coming to realize that scientists don't know what the planet's temperature is.  Much less what it's been over the centuries.  Much less what it will be in centuries to come.

To make assumptions about all three, "scientists" had to distort and/or delete data and fudge their analyses.  Like crazy.

And the world's governments were about to wreak economic havoc on the human species as a result of their "findings."

Here's the important question of the day: Have we learned from this monumental scandal?

One human being has (see above).  Others haven't.  But will.  Sooner or later.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:12 AM
How Congress Works
Kinda reminiscent of how the Supreme Soviet worked in 1951.  In total secrecy.

Why does this come across as being both humorous and pathetic at the same time?
Democrats coy about jobs bill costs
By Meredith Shiner, Politico

Senate Democrats are moving quickly on a jobs bill, with plans for the first procedural votes as early as Monday.

But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on Thursday would not reveal any details about what’s in his bill, how much it would cost or how it would be paid for.

Reid would only say that he’s hoping to get some Republicans on board to make it bipartisan —especially now that Republicans have a 41st senator in Scott Brown, who will be sworn in today. And he predicted that the Senate could pass the bill — whatever is in it — by the end of next week. [link]
He's keeping the details a secret.  And don't ask him about the funding.  But he's looking for broad support.  Probably enthusiastic broad support.  For a bill that is being crafted in secret.  Perhaps by his wife and maid.

I don't know.  Call me naïve but it seems like a national legislature operating in a democratic republic outside the reach of Stalin and his apparatchiks should be working in less secrecy.

But then this is Harry Reid, Democratic leader, friend of the people.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Thursday, February 04, 2010,7:18 AM
Long After The Damage Is Done ...
Shouldn't there be punishment of some sort for the people who - far too often - make mistakes that do irreparable harm?  People like those who publish The Lancet?
Medical journal recants 1998 study linking autism to vaccine
The Globe & Mail

A major British medical journal on Tuesday retracted a flawed study linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism and bowel disease.

The retraction by The Lancet comes a day after a competing medical journal, BMJ, issued an embargoed commentary calling for The Lancet to formally retract the study. The commentary was to have been published on Wednesday.

The BMJ commentary said once the study by British surgeon and medical researcher Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues appeared in 1998 in The Lancet, “the arguments were considered by many to be proven and the ghastly social drama of the demon vaccine took on a life of its own.”

Since the controversial paper was published, British parents abandoned the vaccine in droves, leading to a resurgence of measles. Subsequent studies have found no proof that the vaccine is connected to autism, though some parents are still wary of the shot.

In Britain, vaccination rates for measles have never recovered and there are outbreaks of the disease every year. [link]
Imprison them.  Imprison them all.  This has to stop.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 8 comments
,6:45 AM
While Our Heating Bills Go Through The Roof ...
... and millions of Americans are struggling like never before to make ends meet, Obama plans to suck even more of the lifeblood out of them:
A $2 trillion tax hike
New York Post editorial

Look out, America: President Obama is coming for your money. And this time, almost no one is safe.

The budget he proposed Monday sucks a mind-blowing $2 trillion in new taxes from hard-working Americans -- of practically all stripes -- over the next decade.

You'd think that the president might have taken pause after Bay State voters last month handed Ted Kennedy's Senate seat to an avowed tax-cutter, Scott Brown.

Wrong.

Clearly, Obama isn't letting a little thing like that stop him.

Under his plan, Uncle Sam's cut of US output would rise by nearly half a trillion dollars in the next two years alone. That's a 13.5 percent jump (from 14.8 percent to 16.8 percent).

Who gets socked?

Almost everyone, one way or another. [link]
So many Americans can't pay their bills now.  How will they find the additional cash to pay Obama's increase in taxes?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,6:18 AM
The Twisted Minds of Leftist Americans
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 6 comments
,5:04 AM
While Our Heating Bills Go Through The Roof ...
... Obama is still jacking around with his "clean coal" and "greenhouse gas" nonsense. If it were derisory before, it's enough to piss one off now:
Obama plots new energy path
By Lisa Lerer, Politico

Hoping to increase support in the Senate for his stalled energy bill, President Barack Obama on Wednesday outlined a new strategy to boost biofuels production and reduce greenhouse gas emissions with “clean coal” technology.

Obama announced a carbon capture-and-storage task force to figure out how to deploy “clean coal” technology on a wide scale in the next 10 years. He called for five to 10 commercial demonstration projects to be up and running by 2016. [link]
Good grief.  These jokers are still monkeying around with that carbon capture idiocy.

I have an idea.  How 'bout you geniuses put your heads together and figure out a way to bring energy to the marketplace that the average American can afford?  Prices are going through the roof (including gas; Jarrod just paid $1,500 to have his propane tank filled!) and our biggest concern is over clean energy?  How 'bout we stop that nonsense and worry about those who will have no energy?

- - -

Earth to Obama: We don't need to "capture carbon" at all if man-made global warming is nothing more than flimflammery.  Read a paper lately?  


If not, here's the latest:
IPCC: International Pack of Climate Crooks
By Marc Sheppard, American Thinker

Unquestionably the world’s final authority on the subject, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's findings and recommendations have formed the bedrock of literally every climate-related initiative worldwide for more than a decade. Likewise, virtually all such future endeavors -- be they Kyoto II, domestic cap-and-tax, or EPA carbon regulation, would inexorably be built upon the credibility of the same U.N. panel's "expert" counsel. But a glut of ongoing recent discoveries of systemic fraud has rocked that foundation, and the entire man-made global warming house of cards is now teetering on the verge of complete collapse. 

Simply stated, we've been swindled. We've been set up as marks by a gang of opportunistic hucksters who have exploited the naïvely altruistic intentions of the environmental movement in an effort to control international energy consumption while redistributing global wealth and (in many cases) greedily lining their own pockets in the process.

Here in the states, left-leaning policymakers and their cohorts in the MSM have thus far all but ignored both the reality and implications of the fraud unveiled by Climategate, Glaciergate, Amazongate, and the myriad other AGW-hyping scandals that seem to surface almost daily. Remarkably, most continue to discuss "climate pollution" and "carbon footprints," and the  tragedy of Copenhagen’s failure, even as the global warming fever of their own contagion plunges precipitously. The president appears equally deluded, as passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill (as though the climate might somehow be managed by parliamentary edict) was one of the many goals he set forth in his State of the Union address last week.

But their denial will be short-lived as even the last vestiges of the green lie they so desperately cling to evaporate under the heat of the spotlight suddenly shining upon them. [link]
Yet Obama goes about his business as if nothing has changed.

- - -

In a related item, David S. Van Dyke, in "The CFC Ban: Global Warming's Pilot Episode," makes a point that I've made over the years.  The same bunch of crooks and half-wits who push the global warming blarney argued a few decades ago that chloroflourocabons were creating "ozone holes," a never-proven theory that resulted - once Democrats in Congress got a hold of it - in increased costs amounting to billions of dollars when air conditioning systems and aerosol cans had to be replaced.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Wednesday, February 03, 2010,7:53 AM
They Prefer To Live In Ruins
Tazewell County, which has as its claim to fame the unique position of sporting a population a large portion of which is on some sort of government relief, where 18% of the people live in poverty,  where nearly a quarter of the population is on Medicaid, where another 16% is supported by Social Security, where the "poverty rate is 60% higher than the Virginia rate and the per capita income is only 64% of the per capita income of Virginians," where the two largest employers are the government and Wal-Mart, where the population is in decline because of a lack of job opportunity, has decided it likes things just the way they are.

For the love of God:
Future of Tazewell wind farm looks bleak
By Debra McCown, reporter, Bristol Herald Courier

Tazewell, Va. – A proposed wind farm project might be dead in Tazewell County.

The future looks bleak for the project after the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 Tuesday to prohibit development of tall structures on the county’s scenic ridgelines.

“I think this proposed tall structure construction carries with it too much public controversy and too little public revenue,” said Supervisor Mike Hymes, who cast the deciding vote on a divided board.

The project is one of two announced in far Southwest Virginia a year ago by Dominion and BP Wind Energy. The other, planned for the ridges of Black Mountain in Wise County, has received enthusiastic support from that county’s board. 

“We are proud of the supervisors,” said Charlie Stacy, a member of the Mountain Preservation Association, which formed to opposed the project. “They saved one of God’s greatest creations tonight from devastation.” [link]
“We are proud of the supervisors."  "“They saved one of God’s greatest creations ..."  Some Tazewell County natives who have moved north to find work might tell you that God has forsaken the area, what with the economic devastation that has been inflicted upon it in recent decades.

But they'd be wrong.  God didn't wreak economic ruin on Tazewell County.  Shortsighted, boneheaded county supervisors did.

Here's the bright side:  At least those folks remaining, many of whom will remain on government life support, will have their trees and boulders.  They'll have that.  And happy, apparently, they'll be.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,6:29 AM
Someone Should Break It To Him
Here's the problem:

We simply cannot continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money, as if we can ignore this challenge for another generation.
-- Barack Obama --

Statistics compiled from Obama's Office of Management and Budget in graph form:

 

"We simply cannot continue to spend ..."  As he continues to spend.

My guess is, by 2012 even the Chinese won't have enough money on hand to buy all our debt.  Then what?

Chart courtesy of OMB and Investor's Business Daily.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,6:07 AM
A Problem That Is Not Going Away
One that in fact might get much, much worse:
No Help in Sight, More Homeowners Walk Away
By David Streitfeld, New York Times

The number of Americans who owed more than their homes were worth was virtually nil when the real estate collapse began in mid-2006, but by the third quarter of 2009, an estimated 4.5 million homeowners had reached the critical threshold, with their home’s value dropping below 75 percent of the mortgage balance.

They are stretched, aggrieved and restless. With figures released last week showing that the real estate market was stalling again, their numbers are now projected to climb to a peak of 5.1 million by June — about 10 percent of all Americans with mortgages.

“We’re now at the point of maximum vulnerability,” said Sam Khater, a senior economist with First American CoreLogic, the firm that conducted the recent research. “People’s emotional attachment to their property is melting into the air.” [link]
There's emotional attachment. And then there's credit score.  Default on a major loan was once the kiss of death for an individual.  Maybe not so much any more?

But 5.1 million Americans owning homes that aren't worth nearly what's owed on them poses a very troubling problem.  One that will be a full-blown crisis when they all start walking away from their 5,100,000 loans. 

There is only one solution (and Obama is finding out that it isn't the government one he devised).  A robust economy with everyone back to work.  And that, I'm afraid, isn't coming any time soon.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,5:23 AM
And the Mainstream Media Love Him
Obviouly this joker has no relatives with mental disabilities:
Emanuel apologized for 'retarded' remark
By Ben Smith, Politico

A White House official emails that Rahm Emanuel has acknowledged calling liberal Democrats "retarded" and apologized for the remark.

"Rahm called Tim Shriver Wednesday to apologize and the apology was accepted," the official said.

Shriver is the Chairman and CEO of the Special Olympics, which has launched a campaign against what it calls "the R word."

The remark was first reported last week in the Wall Street Journal, and drew an extended attack from Sarah Palin.

Said the official, “The White House remains committed to addressing the concerns and needs of Americans living with disabilities and recognizes that derogatory remarks demean us all.” [link]
Is it a sincere apology if some "official" offers it up for Emanuel?  Get the impression it isn't all that sincerity-based?

* For the record, Politico leaves out part of the actual reference, for some reason.  Rahm Emanuel actually called certain liberals "f**king retarded."  What a nice guy.  Obama must be so proud.

- - -

Well, it looks like his spokesman's apology didn't get it.  Emanuel Steps Up His Apology.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,5:09 AM
Fascinating
How cool is this?
Early draft of the Constitution found in Phila.
By Edward Colimore, Philadelphia Inquirer Staff Writer

Researcher Lorianne Updike Toler was intrigued by the centuries-old document at the Historical Society of Pennsylvania.

On the back of a treasured draft of the U.S. Constitution was a truncated version of the same document, starting with the familiar words: "We The People. . . ."

They had been scribbled upside down by one of the Constitution's framers, James Wilson, in the summer of 1787. The cursive continued, then abruptly stopped, as if pages were missing.

A mystery, Toler thought, until she examined other Wilson papers from the Historical Society's vault in Philadelphia and found what appeared to be the rest of the draft, titled "The Continuation of the Scheme." [link]
The stuff researchers live for.  I'll bet this discovery made her day.

It's amazing what lurks in America's forgotten nooks and crannies, doesn't it?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:34 AM
The Only Place To Go For News
Amazing:
Still Rolling: Fox News Has Its Best January Ever
by Steve Krakauer, Mediaite

Fox News had its best January in the history of the network, and was the only cable news network to grow year-to-year.

FNC also had the top 13 programs on cable news in total viewers for the fifth month in a row, and the top 13 programs in the A25-54 demographic for the first time in more than five years.

• FNC grew in double digits in both total viewers and the A25-54 demographic from January 2009. In prime time, it was up 22% in total viewers and 51% in the demo. CNN was down 34% and 37% and MSNBC down 26% and 38%. [link]
You'd think the other networks would learn from Fox News's success and strive too to become "fair and balanced."  Odd that they all refuse to adopt a business model that is proving to be wildly successful.  Instead they stick with Katie Couric and Keith Olbermann and Wolfe Blitzer, et al.

Is it any wonder they all continue their free fall?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 8 comments
Tuesday, February 02, 2010,6:17 AM
Baby, It's Cold Outside
And some obscure environmentalist group wants to make it even colder inside:
Foundation rallies against coal-fired plant in Va.
Associated Press

Dendron, Va. (AP) -- The Chesapeake Bay Foundation is urging officials to reject zoning changes necessary for Old Dominion Electric Cooperative to build what could become Virginia's largest coal-fired power plant.

The Dendron City Council hosted a public hearing Monday night on Old Dominion's proposal to build a 1,500-megawatt Cypress Creek Power Station at an estimated cost of up to $6 billion.

Foundation Advocate Chris Moore argues the cooperative's request lacks details about the proposed plant's impact on the community, environment and public health.

Rezoning hearings are set Thursday before the Surry and Sussex counties' boards of supervisors. [link]
Seen your heating bill lately?  Will the bank extend you a loan to pay it?

The only way we're going to be able to bring those astronomical bills down is by (a) bringing a whole lot more (coal-fired power plant generated) energy to the marketplace, and (b) by curtailing the influence of rabid environmentalist groups that only succeed in driving the cost of energy through the roof.

Priorities, people.  Priorities.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:10 AM
La La Land
A Roanoke Times columnist is miffed because a Republican lawmaker is holding up a judge's reappointment.  Because the judge unethically released a grand jury report that detailed (alleged) unethical behavior on the part of a county sheriff.

There's good unethics and there's bad unethics, one must presume.

Good grief.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,6:03 AM
How a Press Release Becomes 'News'
The Southern Environmental Law Center types it up, emails it to a reporter who doesn't want get up off his dead ass and go out into the frigid cold anyway, and ...

... voilà:
Environmental group: Uranium mines a threat
By Laurence Hammack, Roanoke Times

A proposal to mine uranium could contaminate drinking water from the Roanoke River, an environmental group warned Monday as it placed the river basin on a top 10 list of endangered areas in the South.

The Southern Environmental Law Center is concerned about a push to mine uranium in Pittsylvania County, and the possibility of similar projects in the Piedmont region of Virginia. [link]
This is news only if you've lived under a rock for the last millenium.

Of course the Southern Environmental Law Center opposes uranium mining .  The SELC is your typical liberal group of irrational fanatics (with law degrees) who are against anything being dug up out of the ground.  Uranium might get into the Roanoke River ... somehow ... and we all might die!

Breaking news!  Liberal Group Opposes Mining!

A question for the Roanoke Times' publisher: Is this what you pay your reporters to do?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,5:38 AM
P.T. Barnum Knew The Global Warming Crowd
"There's a sucker born every minute."

And speaking of environmentalists ...
The Hottest Hoax in the World
BY Ninad D. Sheth, Open, the magazine

It was presented as fact. The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, led by India’s very own RK Pachauri, even announced a consensus on it. The world was heating up and humans were to blame. A pack of lies, it turns out.

The climate change fraud that is now unravelling is unprecedented in its deceit, unmatched in scope—and for the liberal elite, akin to 9 on the Richter scale. Never have so few fooled so many for so long, ever.

The entire world was being asked to change the way it lives on the basis of pure hyperbole. Propriety, probity and transparency were routinely sacrificed.

The truth is: the world is not heating up in any significant way. Neither are the Himalayan glaciers going to melt as claimed by 2035. Nor is there any link at all between natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and global warming. All that was pure nonsense, or if you like, ‘no-science’!

The climate change mafia, led by Dr Rajendra K Pachauri, chairperson of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), almost pulled off the heist of the century through fraudulent data and suppression of procedure. All the while, they were cornering millions of dollars in research grants that heaped one convenient untruth upon another. And as if the money wasn’t enough, the Nobel Committee decided they should have the coveted Peace Prize.

The world awaits answers, based not on writings of sundry freelance journalists and non-experts, but on actual verifiable data on whether the globe is warming at all, and if so by how much. Only then can policy options be calibrated. As things stand, there is little doubt that the IPCC will need to be reconstituted with a limited mandate. This mess needs investigation and questions need to be answered as to why absurd claims were taken as gospel truth. The future of everything we know as ‘normal’ depends on this. The real danger is that the general public is now weary of the whole thing, a little tired of the debate, and may not really care for the truth, convenient or otherwise. [link]
"This mess needs investigation and questions need to be answered as to why absurd claims were taken as gospel truth."  Yes to all that.  In addition, we expect someone's ass on a platter.  Someone to be called to the dock to answer for the deceit, the lies, and the larceny.  Starting with this jerk:

 

Prison is too good for the likes of this snake oil salesman.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,5:19 AM
Makes You Wonder
Hey, here's news. Danny Williams is coming to the U.S. for heart surgery.

Why's that news?

Guess who Danny Williams is:
Danny Williams going to U.S. for heart surgery
CBC News

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams is set to undergo heart surgery this week in the United States.

CBC News confirmed Monday that Williams, 59, left the province earlier in the day and will have surgery later in the week.

The premier's office provided few details, beyond confirming that he would have heart surgery and saying that it was not necessarily a routine procedure. [link]
That's right.  Danny Williams is a Canadian premier.  A big honcho in the land of idyllic health care.  A land that every liberal wants the U.S. to emulate.  The U.S., where the Canadian premier has to flee (and has the means to flee) to in order to keep from dying.  The U.S., where every liberal thinks we should provide the level of care that forces patients to flee elsewhere in order to ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:34 AM
Fuel For The Tea Party Inferno
Washington logic just doesn't get it any longer.  In fact it's downright infuriating.  First, the troubling news:
Obama budget: Record spending, record deficit
By Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Write

Washington (AP) — Spelling out painful priorities, President Barack Obama urged Congress on Monday to quickly approve a huge new shot of spending for recession relief and job creation, part of a record $3.8 trillion budget that would boost the deficit beyond any in the nation's history while only slowly beginning to put Americans back to work.

The budget paints a remarkably dire picture of a federal government that will have to borrow one-third of what it spends next year as it runs a deficit that still would total some $1.3 trillion. [link]
And what does the man who oversees this dire picture - the federal government will spend one-third more than it will take in - have to say about his $3,800,000,000,000 budget?

"We simply cannot continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if waste doesn't matter, as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money, as if we can ignore this challenge for another generation."

This as the government he runs continues to spend as if deficits don't have consequences, as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people are nothing more than Monopoly money, ignoring all fiscal realities.

For the love of God.

- - -

If that's not bad enough, there's this:


But don't worry.  Nearly all of those taxes will be levied on the wealthy and on Big Business.  The ones who create jobs - or might have created jobs had Obama not decided to run them off to the Caymans and to China respectively by taxing the hell out of them.

Which means those taxes will never be levied.

Which means we're in even bigger trouble than Washington lets on.

- - -

Thank God for small favors.  The New York Times:

"Projections suggest there is virtually no room over the next decade for new domestic initiatives for President Obama or his successors."

Of course, intelligent folks would tell you that it's those domestic initiatives - numbering in the thousands - that got us in this mess in the first place.

The fact that the U.S. can't afford to fund any more of them is good news.  I guess.

- - -

When Obama has lost the Washington Post, you know he's in trouble:

"We can no longer afford to leave the hard choices for the next budget, the next administration or the next generation," President Obama declared as he unveiled the budget. That was true. It was also last year. The fiscal 2011 budget, unveiled yesterday, falls similarly short. 

"[T]he stark fact remains that the president's budget blueprint imagines a government that, in 2020, will spend 23.3 percent of gross domestic product but take in just 18.9 percent. Those percentages are, again, based on optimistic predictions of global events and congressional discipline. And even if they are correct, they sketch out a future that is unsustainable."

The U.S. is on a path that is unsustainable.  And Obama does nothing.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
Monday, February 01, 2010,7:13 AM
Monday Morning Quarterback
Do you suppose Senator Byron Dorgan was saying this sort of thing last year?


In fact Obama did focus on jobs last year. He pushed through - quickly - that massive stimulus bill that he expected would create all the jobs we would need and everything would be rosy by now. He did it quickly because he - and Dorgan, if he was to ever be an honest person - wanted to move to reforming our entire health care delivery system. Quickly.

It's not Obama's fault that the millions of jobs expected didn't materialize. It's just his fault that he wasted $780 million in taxpayer money that the taxpayers don't have any more.

Anyway, it's good to know that the Democrats have their priorities straight, finally.

So now what?

Oh. More of that which failed.

Swell.

Dorgan, 2011: President should have focused on jobs, not stimulus, last year

- - -

A trip down memory lane:

January 10, 2009: "Obama: Stimulus will create 4.1 million jobs."

June 8, 2009: "Obama's Stimulus Promise: More Than 600,000 Jobs."

December 4, 2009: "Obama’s Failed Stimulus in Pictures: Jobs Gap Grows to 7.6 Million."

January 8, 2010: "Obama To Announce New Stimulus Cash For Jobs Today."

Some say he's really smart.  I don't know ... 


Seems like he's stuck on stupid to me.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:38 AM
Upset About Your Heating Bill?
There's a Facebook page where you can at least vent.  And organize?

Go to AEP Action and let loose.

Some of the stories uploaded there, by the way, are full of anger ... at government.  An example:
And considering those who cannot work....female, 86 years old, worked hard all her life, lives on 700 dollars a month. Has one prescription per month her needs, house is small, modest but the electric bill was 378 for Jan. Now figure it out...add it up...with the cost of the grocery bill, taxes. insurance and any needed things ... how can anyone make it on that? She has no car but everything else is so expensive she can't afford one anyway...why are we allowing our government to treat our elderly citizens with such disrespect? Not to mention the ones who are working, paying their bills and they receive a 700 dollar electric bill....where are our lawmakers who are 'working' for us????
Lawmakers working for us.  I remember the day long ago.

Some would argue that lawmakers have actually caused this catastrophe. Who, after all, sets utility rates?  Beyond that, what other publically traded company is guaranteed a specific profit margin by Virginia law?  And who saddled AEP with outrageous environmental compliance surcharges running in the tens of millions, charges that are simply passed on to consumers?  And when AEP attempts to comply to federal emissions standards, and the cost of that compliance runs in the billions, who's to blame?

Then there's the whole monopoly issue.

Angry customers look to government for relief.  My view is that any more "relief" and we're all going to be out in the cold.

- - -

A description of  AEP Action as provided by its Facebook page:


Join Delegate Bill Carrico and other elected officials in opposing another request by Appalachian Power increase in Southwest Virginia. The web site, AEPAction.org, will be re-launched again soon to give you a voice with the Virginia SCC to help fight this request. Please forward this group and share it with your friends on Facebook to help.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 5 comments
,6:26 AM
It Was All a Lie
Another global warming claim is found to be fiction:
UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim
By Jonathan Leake, Times of London

A startling report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said in its 2007 benchmark report that even a slight change in rainfall could see swathes of the rainforest rapidly replaced by savanna grassland.

The source for its claim was a report from WWF, an environmental pressure group, which was authored by two green activists. They had based their “research” on a study published in Nature, the science journal, which did not assess rainfall but in fact looked at the impact on the forest of human activity such as logging and burning. This weekend WWF said it was launching an internal inquiry into the study. [link
As I suspected all along, these wild claims were all made up.  None of them were true.  The "science" was nothing more than propaganda.

Never forget: The world's environmentalists were prepared to alter your way of life based on these perversions.  Never forget them.  Never let down your guard.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,5:57 AM
'Brownie, You're Doing a heck of a Job'
I wonder why not one member of the mainstream press has likened Obama's miserable response to the devastation that is Haiti to that which George W. Bush brought to ... Katrina!  If "response" is even the right word.

Another example of either fecklessness or disinterest.  You decide:
New Study Suggests U.S. Ambassador Rice Isn't Engaging the UN
By Richard Grenell, writing in the Huffington Post

[Permanent Representative to the UN Susan] Rice has been spending several days a week in Washington with her larger than normal DC-based staff and spending less time with the 200-plus employees who work for her in New York. While Rice launched her tenure with a glamour spread in Vogue Magazine by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz showing her kicking back in an empty Security Council Chamber, she seems to not enjoy the Chamber when it's full of diplomats. During the recent Haiti crisis, Rice was not only absent from the Security Council vote to expand the UN's peacekeeping operation but she also failed to call an emergency meeting in the immediate aftermath to request more help. In fact, 7 days after the Haiti earthquake left tens of thousands of people in the streets without food or shelter, it was UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon that came to the Security Council to request more troops - the American Ambassador hadn't bothered. [link]
It's fair to say that very few of the victims of Hurricane Katrina died after the storm subsided.  Nearly all were killed in circumstances brought about directly by either wind or flood.  In Haiti, the relief effort, as sporadic as it's been, as underwhelming as it's been, as leaderless as it's been, has caused the deaths of thousands who were trapped in rubble and unable to escape.  Studies will eventually show that more people died in Port au Prince of starvation and dehydration than died in the entirety of the Katrina calamity.

But you'd never know it by following the mainstream press.  The narrative with those morons is devoted to Bono and George Clooney and Madonna and we-are-the-world ... And on Michelle Obama's campaign against obesity.

More of the same.

Bottom line: George Bush can fairly be criticized for his inadequate response to the storm that destroyed New Orleans.  But his failure doesn't hold a candle to the non-response and indifference that has come out of the White House since Haiti was destroyed and 150,000 human beings lost their lives.

Some day the press will take note of it.  Perhaps before we're all dead and gone.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,5:09 AM
Ya Think?
Here's one that will set you back on your heals:


Ya think?

Here's what I think: It's perfectly acceptable.  (If boneheaded).  Here's why:

Fox News is routinely criticized for being right of center politically.  To make the point, those critics cite Sean Hannity (who is proudly to the right) and Bill O'Reilly (who is sometimes to the right and sometimes to the left).  But what isn't mentioned - or understood - is the fact that Fox has round-the-clock news that is interrupted periodically with commentary.  Fox isn't conservative.  In fact it's fair and balanced.  But it certainly has segments hosted by conservative commentators at times during each day.

MSNBC has the same setup.  But at the opposite end of the spectrum.  It is a news channel that features segments that are very leftist (and in Matthews's case, pathetically idiotic).  And that's okay, if understood.

Separate out the commentary from the news.  Biased news is a whole different subject.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 9 comments
Sunday, January 31, 2010,7:56 AM
Out Of Both Sides Of Their Mouths
The Roanoke Times editorialists on raising the gas tax:

"Granted, any increase will pinch all consumers, and its regressive nature would hurt lower-income drivers more.

It still deserves support ..."

The Roanoke Times editorialists on the power company raising rates:

"Appalachian Power couldn't have chosen a worse time to implement a double-digit interim rate increase. The 12.5 percent raise comes when electric customers are confronting bills for a frigid winter snap that caused furnaces to run nonstop.

"Appalachian might appease both lawmaker and constituent by rescinding the interim raise at least until this cold winter passes."

 Aren't those electricity customers the same people who buy gasoline?

My hair hurts.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 4 comments
,7:38 AM
Well, As Long As The Gov't Had Good Intentions
After all, it's only money:
Minnesota wind turbines won’t work in cold weather
By Ed Morrissey

Minnesota invested itself in alternative energy sources years ago, and so the revelation that the state spent $3.3 million on eleven wind turbines hardly qualifies as news. However, the fact that they don’t work in cold weather does. KSTP reports that none of the wind turbines work, prompting the Twin Cities ABC affiliate to dub them “no-spin zones.” [link]
It turns out that fault lies with the "green" technology company that produced the turbines and guaranteed their effectiveness.

But if you've been following this saga about "green technology" and "green jobs," you've come to the understanding that it's not about technology or jobs at all.  It's about environmentalists feeling good about themselves.  They built windmills!  Eleven of 'em!  And three people were given jobs!  And the planet is saved!  And the project only cost 3 million!

So what if the damn things don't work.

Which brings us to those curlicue light bulbs that don't light well ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,7:16 AM
Remember, These Are Scientists
Or are they?


This fits into the same category with Al Gore winning the Nobel Peace Prize.

Both make you shake your head in wonder and ask, "What in God's name were these people thinking?"
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:44 AM
As I've Said Before ...
The biggest problem with our current health insurance "crisis"?  The government is involved. 
Mental Health Parity for Insurance
By Megan McArdle, The Atlantic

Apparently, the administration has issued rules requiring parity for mental health treatment with other illnesses. They'll take effect July 1st. If you want to know why health insurance costs keep marching upward seemingly uncontrolled, this is why: mandating new benefits is always popular, and the government doesn't have to pay for them. [link]
Try to imagine government mandated car insurance. Lexuses are nice.  Everyone should have one.  Therefore the government, being everyone's best friend when it comes to giving away other peoples' cash, mandates that everyone get a Lexus and the insurance companies pay for them.  Do you suppose the price of insurance would go up?

That's the state of our health insurance industry.  So many ailments, illnesses, diseases, treatments, procedures, counseling, etc. that the government wants covered.  And cover them all the insurance industry will.  At a price.  Until employers and policyholders can no longer afford the insurance.

Welcome to America, 2010.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:42 AM
How Quickly Things Have Changed
Just a year ago Democrats were falling all over themselves in eager anticipation of being seen in the same room with Mr. Messiah.

Today?  "Uh, that wasn't me you saw in that photo.  That was my evil twin."

Unfortunately, they can run but they can't hide:
GOP to tie Obama to Dem candidates
By Jonathan Martin, Politico

Honolulu – As buoyant Republicans devise their game plan for the 2010 campaign, party officials are counting on a boost from an unlikely source – President Obama.

A tactic that would have seemed far-fetched a year ago, when the new president was sworn in with a 67 percent job approval rating, is now emerging as a key component of the GOP strategy: Tie Democratic opponents to Obama and make them answer for some of the unpopular policies associated with the chief executive.

GOP strategists gathered here for the Republican National Committee’s winter meeting believe that now that he's fallen below 50 percent in the venerable Gallup poll, Obama will be an asset to GOP candidates, particularly in conservative or swing states. [link]
Those GOP strategists might want to start here in Southwest Virginia:

 

Rick Boucher voted for Obama's anti-coal bill.

Rick Boucher voted for Obama's anti-coal bill.

Rick Boucher voted for Obama's anti-coal bill.

Rick Boucher voted for Obama's anti-coal bill.

Rick Boucher voted for Obama's anti-coal bill.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Saturday, January 30, 2010,7:51 AM
Unfortunately, it's still General Motors
I was reading the latest issue of Consumer Reports last night and found its ratings of  the 2010 family of small cars to be interesting.  Listed at the top were those makes and models you'd expect to see - Toyota, Nissan, Volkswagen, Honda, Prius, Sentra - and some you might be suprised to see - Hyundai.  Listed at the bottom, way at the bottom almost in a class by itself, was ...

... the Chevy Aveo.  Still.

All the taxpayer dollars in the world aren't going to help if GM doesn't stop making crappy cars.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,7:44 AM
Gun bills flourish because of mass shootings
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,7:22 AM
Fools
With all the hand-wringing and the tears, the wails and condemnations, the tough talk and Bush-is-a-moron-we-know-better, Obama is taking the Guantanamo issue right where G.W. Bush had it all along.  In Guantanamo:
Bay what? Guantanamo eyed for 9/11 trial
By John Doyle, David Seifman, and Charles Hurt, New York Post

The trial of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed won't be held in lower Manhattan and could take place in a military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay, sources said last night.

Administration officials said that no final decision had been made but that officials of the Department of Justice and the White House were working feverishly to find a venue that would be less expensive and less of a security risk than New York City.

The back-to-the-future Gitmo option was reported yesterday by Fox News and was not disputed by White House officials. [link]
 Just days ago Mr. My-First-Official-Act-Will-Be-To-Close-Gitmo said this:

"Make no mistake, we will close Guantanamo prison, which has damaged our national security interests and become a tremendous recruiting tool for al-Qaeda.  In fact, that was an explicit rationale for the formation of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula."

Well, it turns out our national security interests weren't damaged, apparently, and Guantanamo isn't really a recruiting tool for those Islamist assholes. In fact, it's a darn good place to warehouse those who have vowed to do our children grievous harm.  And a wonderful place to hold military tribunals.

To all of you who excoriated Bush for keeping Gitmo opened and cheered Obama's decision to close it - and you know who you are - what say you now?

My guess is you have nothing to say.  Finally.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,7:19 AM
Coal Is Off The Hook
Long after the debunking of anthropogenic global warming theory has taken its toll and pounded the final nail in its coffin there will still be environmentalists out there who will be whining about carbon footprints and CO2 greenhouse gases.  Because the ploy gets the conversation where they want it to be.  If the EPA follows through and declares CO2 (the stuff we exhale and plants thrive on) to be a pollutant, then our government can tax and regulate us back into the Stone Age, where they think we'll live at one with nature.

But their dreams and aspirations all rest on the theory that global temperatures are affected in a significant way by CO2 levels in the atmosphere.  An ever more discredited theory:
NOAA, NASA: Water Vapor Largely Responsible for Global Warming
By Nate Kharrl, Eco Factory

An increase in atmospheric water vapor is responsible for at least a third of the average temperature increase since the early 1990s, say scientists at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Susan Soloman, the respected climate scientist who lead the research, says that this finding does not undermine man-made global warming theories. "Not to my mind it doesn't," she said. Soloman did point out that the research does allude to human emissions having a much smaller role in climate change than previously thought, and serves as a warning to climate modelers who "over-interpret the results from a few years one way or another." Despite Soloman's personally held belief, the NOAA study is expected to give further ammunition to climate skeptics working to draw public attention to perceived flaws in man-made global warming theories.

NASA scientist Eric Fetzer say that the new study created models much more accurate to past events than those previously used by climate change advocates, and proves that "water vapor is the big player in the atmosphere as far as climate is concerned." [link]
Water vapor. Not CO2. Therefore not carbon. Therefore not coal.

Remember that next time some enviro-wacko tells you he's going to alter your way of life in order to save the planet from certain destruction.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,7:05 AM
And They Wonder Why The Tea Party Movement Has Caught Fire
From "Class War, How public servants became our masters":
In California unfunded pension and health care liabilities for state workers top $100 billion, and the annual pension contribution has shot up from $320 million to $7.3 billion in less than a decade. In New York state, local governments may have to triple their annual pension contributions during the next six years, from $2.6 billion to $8 billion, according to the state comptroller.

That money will come from taxpayers. The average private-sector worker, who enjoys a lower salary and far lower retirement benefits than New York or California government workers, will have to work longer, retire later, and pay more so that his public-employee neighbors can enjoy the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed. The taxpayers will also have to deal with worsening public services, since there will be less money to pay for things that might actually benefit the public.
It's broken.  And it may be irreparable.  And they don't care.

Our forefathers look on in shame and heartache.  Tinged with rage.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:41 AM
'Meet Me Half Way'
Obama to Republicans: "Let's work in a bipartisan fashion to get accomplished everything I've itemized on that document in front of you that I'll need signed before you leave the room."

Key word being bipartisan.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 2 comments
,6:20 AM
I'm Game
Call me old-fashioned.  These days I generally consume my bourbon straight from the bottle.  Sometimes, in an effort to impress, in a glass, over ice.  I've even been known to mix it with Coke.

But with fruit juices?  In pie, coffee, and ice cream?

What's the world coming to?

It's come to this:



"Paula, you know what I want for dessert tonight?  Horse race pie."
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,5:55 AM
Getting a Few Priorities Right ... or not
Gosh.  Yesterday I agreed with Obama on funding nuclear power.  Today it's his decision to defund NASA.  Is this a trend?  The latest good news out of the White House:
Obama to End NASA Constellation Program
FOXNews.com

On the eve of the fullest moon of the year, NASA scientists were told they won't be able to visit any longer. In his new budget, President Obama plans to eliminate the space program's manned moon missions.

When the president releases his budget on Monday, a White House official confirmed on Thursday, there will be a big hole where funding for NASA's Constellation program used to be. Constellation is the umbrella program that includes the Ares rocket -- the replacement for the aging space shuttles. [link]
This decision was long overdue.  The money being poured into NASA is, as far its existing manned space program is concerned, a massive waste of taxpayer money.  The shuttle program amounts to nothing more these days than a regular effort to see if we can launch a vehicle into space and get it to return without hurting anyone.  Hardly the stuff that Gene Roddenberry contemplated.

The bitter truth (sorry, JFK) is, we can't afford the expenditure any longer.  And the goal has degenerated to the point of insignificance.  And the bureaucratic bloat is staggering.  So there are good reasons to scale back the missio ...

Oh, wait.  I didn't read far enough into the article:
NASA will receive an additional $5.9 billion over five years, some of which will be used to extend the life of the International Space Station to 2020. The official said it also will be used to entice companies to build private spacecraft to ferry astronauts to the space station after the space shuttle retires.
So funding for NASA will continue to expand.  And the shuttle "mission" (again, the mission being nothing more than to keep all the "astronauts" alive) will continue apace.

We're still on track. 

For the love of God.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 4 comments
,5:27 AM
They Haven't Learned a Thing
Millions of Americans unemployed?  So what?  We have more important things to concentrate on:


To be sure, Obama is acting on the request of Senator Orrin Hatch - a Republican - for an investigation of college football to determine whether or not the Bowl Championship Series violates anti-trust law.  Something every American worries about on a daily basis.

Nothing better to do, one must surmise.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 12 comments
Friday, January 29, 2010,7:32 AM
They Found That Poor Little Boy
He had been tossed into the trash.  And ended up in the landfill.

There is no punishment harsh enough ...
Body found at Roanoke Co. landfill
By Amanda Codispoti, Roanoke Times

Amid acres of the Roanoke Valley's forgotten waste, a team of people looking for toddler Aveion Lewis on Wednesday found the body of a small child.

Police Chief Joe Gaskins could not say with certainty that the body found in a Western Roanoke County landfill was that of Aveion's. The medical examiner will identify the remains and a cause of death.

Roanoke Commonwealth's Attorney Donald Caldwell said Wednesday evening that he had previously planned to present a murder charge against the child's stepfather, Brandon Lockett, to the grand jury on Monday.

Now that police have discovered a child's body, that may change, Caldwell said. [link]
My son, Jarrod, as a member of Roanoke's Swift Water Rescue team, spent hours searching for little Aveion's body in the Roanoke River, hoping they find it, and yet hoping they don't.

As it turned out, the body lie amid the other refuse in a landfill not far from Jarrod's home.

Brandon Lockett, it is reported, has confessed to having killed the boy.  Maybe now he'll confess to having tossed the child into the garbage as well.

When the news came Paula suggested that there is no punishment on this earth that fits the crime committed.  I reminded her that Virginia has, at least, the death penalty for scum like Brandon Lockett.

But Paula is right.  There's no punishment within the law that fits this crime.  He deserves to feel pain.  Suffering.  Like tiny Aveion did. And more.

So much more.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,7:22 AM
Now We're Talkin'
Ask anyone in Southwest Virginia who has to pay AEP to keep their lights on and you will find unanimity when it comes to cultivating cheap sources of energy.  And I'm not talking about the silly and distracting "green energy" which won't ever amount to much beyond being a big contributor to our national debt.  I'm talking coal.  And ...
Obama Said to Seek $54 Billion in Nuclear-Power Loan Guarantees 
By Daniel Whitten and Hans Nichols, Bloomberg

Jan. 29 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama, acting on a pledge to support nuclear power, will propose tripling loan guarantees for new reactors to more than $54 billion, two people familiar with the plan said.

The additional loan guarantees in Obama’s budget, which will be released on Feb. 1, are part of an effort to bolster nuclear-power production after Obama called for doing so in his State of the Union address Jan. 27. Today, the Energy Department plans to announce creation of a panel to find a solution to storing the waste generated by nuclear plants.

“To create more of these clean-energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives,” Obama said in his speech. “That means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear-power plants in this country. ” [link]
He might have pledged to fight the powerful environmentalist lobby to keep the costs of bringing additional quantities of nuclear energy to market from reaching into the trillions.  But Obama is a Democrat, so we can't expect too much.

Beyond that ... 

Here's the bottom line: Electricity rates are going through the roof (see note about environmentalists above).  Unaffordably and unsustainably.  We need a lot more (cheap) energy to drive the price back down so as to keep poor people from turning off their heat because they can't afford it.  It's getting that bad.

Nuclear energy will save lives.

So here's to Obama's effort to resurrect the nuclear industry.  May he succeed beyond our wildest imaginations.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 4 comments
,7:04 AM
That's Not a Good Argument
Defenders of President Obama will invariably use as a justification of his actions the now-tired line, "But Bush did it too!"  Like that means it's not bad if it was done before.  Especially by the "conservative" Mr. Bush.  Whatever "it" may involve. 

It's annoying, to say the least.  And irrelevant without doubt.

And there's this:
Obama Perpetuates the Myth of Bush as Free-Marketeer
By Ilya Somin, The Volokh Conspiracy

In the State of the Union, Obama continued to blame Bush and the Republicans for our current economic problems. This is understandable for two reasons. First,the GOP does deserve a good deal of blame, though my list of their misdeeds would probably look different from Obama’s. Second, pretty much any president in Obama’s position would do the same thing.

Much less defensible is Obama’s attempt to claim that the Republicans purused free market policies during the last eight years, and thereby caused the economic crisis ...

In reality, of course, the Bush-era GOP greatly expanded government control of the economy, including major increases in spending, regulation, and federal “investment” in education.

The Bush as free marketeer meme is an important prop in the Democrats’ case for massively expanding government control of the economy today. Logically, of course, it is possible to argue for such an expansion even if Bush did it too. Maybe he just didn’t go far enough, or didn’t calibrate his interventions as precisely as the Democrats plan to with theirs. From the standpoint of political rhetoric, however, it’s much easier for Obama to justify greatly expanded government if he can portray it as the opposite of his discredited predecessor’s policy. The gambit probably wouldn’t work if the public knew the facts about what Bush did. Obama, however, may be banking on widespread political ignorance, reinforced by the GOP’s image as the pro-free market party. He is far from the first politician to try to take advantage of ignorance. The Republicans have hardly been above doing the same thing when it suited their interests. But the fact that everyone does it doesn’t make it right. [link]
Bush as free marketeer.  I have to chuckle.

"But the fact that everyone does it doesn’t make it right."  That's for all you Obama supporters.  In fact it's wrong.  Time to come up with an actual argument.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:59 AM
Bouncing Off The Walls
When are these guys going to start thinking before they act?
White House asks Justice Department to look for other places to hold 9/11 terror trial
By Kenneth R. Bazinet, Adam Lisberg and Samuel Goldsmith, New York Daily News

The White House ordered the Justice Department Thursday night to consider other places to try the 9/11 terror suspects after a wave of opposition to holding the trial in lower Manhattan.

The dramatic turnabout came hours after Mayor Bloomberg said he would "prefer that they did it elsewhere" and then spoke to Attorney General Eric Holder.

The order to consider new venues does not change the White House's position that Mohammed should be tried in civilian court. [link]
I'm thinking Obama could move the terrorist trial to San Francisco where folks seem to have a special place in their hearts for those who hate America and want it destroyed.

Or he could move the trial here to the mountains of Southwest Virginia where we have a special liking for Islamists too.  We hear they make good kindling.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:42 AM
You Want a Strategy?
You want a strategy?


How 'bout this for a theme, an outgrowth of the hundreds of Tea Party protests that have taken place over the last twelve months:

Tear it down. Start over again.

The American people, in overwhelming numbers, know the system is broken and hurtling toward certain doom.

Anything less than A New Beginning will only lengthen the timetable.

- - -

Doom as exemplified by this.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:26 AM
The 'Copenhagen Effect' Comes To Denver?
Obama traveled to Copenhagen to win over the Olympic Committee. They rejected him.

He traveled to Copenhagen again to get climate change legislation approved. He was rejected again.

Mr. Magic then traveled to New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts to help Jon Corzine, Creigh Deeds, and Martha Coakley win. 

All lost.

He now heads to Denver, Colorado to assist the campaign of one Michael Bennet.  Poor guy.
Obama coming to help Bennet in February
Associated Press

Denver — The White House has confirmed that President Barack Obama will visit Colorado in February to attend an event with U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.

White House spokesman Adam Abrams said Thursday that the details are still being worked out.

Craig Hughes, Bennet's campaign manager, says Obama will be in Colorado to campaign for the senator, who is running for election. A date hasn't been set.

Bennet was appointed by fellow Democrat Gov. Bill Ritter to the Senate last year to complete Ken Salazar's term. Obama appointed Salazar as Interior secretary. [link]
Oh, dear.  What did Bennet do to deserve this?

Hat tip to Michelle Malkin.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:11 AM
A Post Mortem On Obama's Speech
From Peggy Noonan:

"The central fact of the speech was the contradiction at its heart. It repeatedly asserted that Washington is the answer to everything. At the same time it painted a picture of Washington as a sick and broken place. It was a speech that argued against itself: You need us to heal you. Don't trust us, we think of no one but ourselves."

And the Democrats cheered every word of it. 

- - -

James Taranto adds this:

"If the voters of Massachusetts sent a message, President Obama refuses to listen."
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:01 AM
On The Law Professor's Understanding of the Law
Obama, for those not aware of it, was a law professor before he became what he's become.  One wonders, when reading the following what his understanding of the law amounted to:
Obama v. the Supremes
Alito wins the oral, and factual, argument.
Wall Street Journal editorial

We're not among those who think the Supreme Court is above criticism. Especially in recent decades as the judiciary has become more political, and has encroached on the powers of Congress and the executive, politicians in the other branches have an obligation to defend their powers. Mr. Obama may have exhibited bad manners in sandbagging the Justices without warning on national TV, but he has every right to disagree with their rulings.

But could a graduate of Harvard Law School at least get his facts right? "Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections," Mr. Obama averred. "Well, I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities."

Let's unpack the falsehoods. The Court didn't reverse "a century of law," but merely two more recent precedents, one from 1990 and part of another from 2003. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce in 1990 had set the Court in a markedly new direction in limiting independent corporate campaign expenditures. This is the outlier case that needed to be overturned.

Mr. Obama is also a sudden convert to stare decisis. Does he now believe that all Court precedents of a certain duration are sacrosanct, such as Plessy v. Ferguson (separate but equal, 1896), which was overturned by Brown v. Board (1954)? Or Bowers v. Hardwick (a ban on sodomy, 1986), which was overturned by Lawrence v. Texas (2003)?

The President's claim about "foreign entities" bankrolling U.S. political campaigns is also false, since the Court did not overrule laws limiting such contributions. His use of "foreign" was a conscious attempt to inflame public and Congressional opinion against the Court. Coming from a President who fancies himself a citizen of the world, and who has gone so far as foreswear American exceptionalism, this leap into talk-show nativism is certainly illuminating. What will they think of that one in the cafes of Berlin?

Desperate Presidents do desperate things, and Mr. Obama's riff against the Supremes reveals a President who—let us try to follow Mr. Obama's admonition about changing the "tone" of our politics—lacks grace under pressure. [link requires subscription]
On a separate note, I was able to watch the clip showing Justice Alito's reaction to Obama spewing these various falsehoods.  The one in which Alito shook his head and mouthed the words, "Not true."  There will be those who will cheer his response and there will be those who'll denounce him for it.  I find it interesting that nobody opposes audience members reacting to the president's speech - as Alito is defensively responding to Obama's attack Senators Chuck Schumer and Patty Murray are also shaking their heads (up and down) and rising to clap and cheer - they only oppose negative reactions.  At least this year and with this president.

Whatever.

But understand, I believe in participatory meetings.  I'd have been in the audience starting a chant, "You lied! You lied!  You lied!"  I find hugfests to be so much a waste of time.

- - -

James Taranto:

"How can you tell when President Obama is lying? Justice Samuel Alito's lips move.

"If the president of the United States is going to display his contempt for a coequal branch of government and the First Amendment, you'd think he could at least be troubled to get his facts straight."
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,4:30 AM
A Perspective On Unions
From one who works side-by-side with card carrying members.

In yesterday's comments to this blog post I found one from "Krispy."  He or she offers some valuable perspective:

I might be able to provide a little insight. I'm a private sector laborer who isn't part of the local union. To some of my union co-workers I'm a leper. But I'm not gonna knock these people, most of them are just honest folks who want to make a living.

The corporations aren't really doing anything to decrease the need for unions, as far as I can tell. That's not the issue. What's happening is that the unions (especially the big umbrella outfits) are marginalizing themselves from the top down. It isn't about protecting honest working people anymore, that idea is anachronistic. Big labor today is just a political movement, and they're increasingly out of step with the rank and file who they rely on for dues.

And make no mistake, that's all a man with a lunch pail is to big labor: We're just the golden goose. They'll gut us at the drop of a hat. And we know it.

Of course there are still very passionate pro-union people on local levels ... but when you talk to them it becomes obvious that their fervor is really their religion. It's simple fundamentalism, and like all fundamentalists, they see outsiders as the enemy. If you don't share their beliefs, you're an anathema. They believe what they believe on faith, and evidence to the contrary simply has to be lies. It's simple: Grandaddy was a union man, daddy was a union man, and so am I. Gimme that old time religion.

As more and more people wake up to how destructive (or, at best, irrelevant) big labor is ... and as more and more of the old-timers retire ... there is less and less willingness to accept what we're told just based on faith. The younger people in the workplace are paying attention to the world around us (what the UAW has done to Detroit, how happy non-union Wal-Mart employees tend to be, how badly big labor wants to take away blind elections and right-to-work laws, etc) and we're more willing to question what the unions tell us. It's supposed to be a business relationship, not a religion. The union halls are supposed to be business offices, not churches. And if what the unions have to offer is a losing proposition, why should we buy what they're selling?

My two cents.
Two cents worth far more than two cents.  Thanks, Krispy.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
Thursday, January 28, 2010,7:56 AM
Unions Thrive!
Well, they thrive where the boss man doesn't have to compete:



Two contributing factors: (1) unionized companies in the private sector continue to disappear, and (2) the government continues to grow.

In a few years?

Chart courtesy of Barry T. Hirsch and David A. Macpherson
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,7:44 AM
While Obama Wants To Throw Tax Dollars At Our Problem ...
... the private sector shows us how innovation and quality control actually bring about success:


The company that the Treasury Department Henry Ford built was even profitable - very profitable - in North America.

Ford rocks.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,7:08 AM
Some Common Sense Regarding The Supreme Court Ruling
George Will:
Cleta Mitchell, Washington's preeminent campaign finance attorney, rightly says that few for-profit corporations will jeopardize their commercial interests by engaging in partisan politics: Republicans, Democrats and independents buy Microsoft's and Pepsi's products. If for-profit corporations do plunge into politics, disclosure of their spending will enable voters to draw appropriate conclusions. Of course, political speech regulations radiate distrust of voters' abilities to assess unfettered political advocacy.

Mitchell says the court's decision primarily liberates nonprofit advocacy groups, such as the Sierra Club, which the FEC fined $28,000 in 2006. The club's sin was to distribute pamphlets in Florida contrasting the environmental views of the presidential and senatorial candidates, to the intended advantage of Democrats. FEC censors deemed this an illegal corporate contribution.  [link]
I can see it now.  Leftists in this country who, just days ago, were whining about the decision opening the floodgates to corporate cash and corporate influence, when they find out that in fact advocacy groups like the leftist Sierra Club will benefit far more than Halliburton! will, can be expected to reply with ...

... well, that's okay then.

Such rock-solid intellectuals they are.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:27 AM
Silence
Where are those New York Times reporters who roundly criticized George W. Bush for his "go-it-alone" strategy in our War on Terror?


Looks like Barry is going to go it alone.

I can just hear the howls of derision coming from the Times.

I can just hear ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,6:16 AM
Solving the 'Undesirables' Problem
Oh, well.


Alexandra Nuñez was only Hispanic.

Planned Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, would say her plan is on track.  One less undesirable.

In a civilized world, tears would flow.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:51 AM
Magic Wand Won't Make It Better
I was struck the other day as I was watching President Obama deliver a teleprompting to his White House Task Force on Middle Class Families how few of the recommendations that he and the members thereof had come up with that actually related to job creation and growth.  Most could be labeled as "welfare as we know it," and some had to do with tax breaks, which are certainly needed.

But what about jobs?  Does he have any answers besides "stimulus"?  He didn't in that speech.

I didn't watch the State of the Union address last night (I have things I have to do early in the morning, ahem), but some people who are experts in the field of economics did.  And they have this assessment:
Staying the Course
The same agenda in more humble clothes
Wall Street Journal editorial

So much for all of that Washington talk about a midcourse change of political direction. If President Obama took any lesson from his party's recent drubbing in Massachusetts, and its decline in the polls, it seems to be that he should keep doing what he's been doing, only with a little more humility, and a touch more bipartisanship.

Mr. Obama's economic pitch ... differed little from last year, when the jobless rate was 7.2%. He offered a spirited defense of the stimulus, though the jobless rate is now 10%, and he promised more of the same this year, especially on "green jobs." He also offered some minor if welcome tax cuts for small business, and $30 billion in handouts for "community banks" to be able to lend more.

Yet at the same time, he couldn't resist more banker baiting, and he promised that he's determined to see tax rates rise for millions of Americans next year when the Bush rates are set to expire. He also pushed more exports while saying he'll raise taxes on some of our biggest exporters, otherwise known as multinationals that "ship our jobs overseas." Mr. Obama believes he can conjure jobs and a durable expansion from the private sector while waging political war on its animal spirits. It can't be done.

This reflects a larger problem, which is his belief that economic growth springs mainly from the genius of government. Thus Mr. Obama presented a vision of an economy soaring to new heights on "high-speed railroad" and "clean energy facilities" and 1,000 people making solar panels in California. He seems not to appreciate that what really drives growth are the millions of risks taken each day by millions of individuals, far from the politicking and earmarks of Congress or the Department of Energy. [link]
You read here the other day about the foolishness that guys like Obama call "green jobs."  Governor Kaine here in Virginia is proud, according to the Roanoke Times, that he was able to create five green jobs here in Southwest Virginia at a cost of millions during his tenure.

Five jobs.

Costing millions of taxpayer dollars.

Even the Big-Government types at the Times had trouble defending that bit of hooey.

The experts at the Wall Street Journal seem equally unimpressed with the recommended solutions to our problems that Obama delivered last night.  After liberals throw money at a weak economy and the economy only worsens, what's a liberal to do?  Something that might actually work?

No.

Obama wants to throw more government money at government driven programs - green jobs - and, as if they haven't been punished enough, he intends to tax the living hell out of the rich, until they too are in our boat.

What's that term that General Honoré came up with a few years ago for people who are bashing their heads against a brick wall?  I'm trying to remember ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:50 AM
Is Chris Matthews' Show Still On The Air?
Glenn Harlan Reynolds on that groupie whore's latest embarrassing pronouncement ("You know, I forgot he was black for an hour"):

"Good grief. Why is this guy still on the air? Oh, wait, he’s not — he’s on MSNBC . . .."

Is he?

Here's the latest cable news ratings, published by the Drudge Report:


Where's Matthews?

Must have been off somewhere doing someone something else.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:50 AM
But It Got Him His Gig
A Reaction to the speech last night:


I think he's learning that "BUSH!," though a great election year tactic, does not policy make.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,5:09 AM
Teleprompter Should Be On Mt. Rushmore For That Speech
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:58 AM
Gosh, I'm Sorry I Didn't Stay Up & Watch
Michael Gerson on the State of the Union speech last night:

"For much of the speech Obama sounded like a commerce secretary at a professional conference on a particularly uninspired day."

Ouch.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:35 AM
Giving Credit Where It's Due
On Virginia Senate Bill 268, which provided "that the governing body of any locality may, by ordinance, make it unlawful for any person to possess a dangerous weapon upon the property, including buildings and grounds thereof, of any facility that is owned or leased by that locality and used by it for governmental purposes," which would have voided that which we call preemption, was defeated in the Committee on Local Government by a vote of 6 yea and 9 nay on Tuesday. 

Put in terms that everyone can understand, the bill would have voided a portion of the Bill of Rights should some liberal city council somewhere decide to ban possession of firearms on their (actually the taxpayers') property.

Included among those who voted to support the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution -

Roscoe Reynolds, D-20.

Here's to ya, Roscoe.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:33 AM
The Left Reacts
You know Obama is in free fall when his most loyal newspaper has this for a lead headline:


Hope!  Change!  Stop!  Don't retreat!
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
Wednesday, January 27, 2010,5:23 AM
It's Official
ObamaCare is dead.  The Democrats' mouthpiece, New York Times, says so:
Democrats Put Lower Priority on Health Bill

Washington — With no clear path forward on major health care legislation, Democratic leaders in Congress effectively slammed the brakes on President Obama’s top domestic priority on Tuesday, saying they no longer felt pressure to move quickly on a health bill after eight months of setting deadlines and missing them.

The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, deflected questions about health care.

“We’re not on health care now,” Mr. Reid said. “We’ve talked a lot about it in the past.”

He added, “There is no rush,” and noted that Congress still had most of this year to work on the health bills passed in 2009 by the Senate and the House.

Mr. Reid said he and the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, were working to map out a way to complete a health care overhaul in coming months. [link]
Coming months, my ass.  Coming decades is more like it.

Breathe a short sigh of relief.  We dodged a bullet on this one.

But other bullets are coming.  You can count on that.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,4:55 AM
All They Had To Do Was Ask
We could have told them what "the most trusted name in news" is.

CNN?

Please.
Fox Is The Most Trusted Name In News According To New Poll
By Noel Sheppard, NewsBusters

CNN might call itself the most trusted name in news, but a new poll found Americans think the Fox News Channel is the organization deserving this honor.

In fact, according to Public Policy Polling, FNC is the only national television news organization that more people trust than distrust.

A new poll asking Americans whether they trust each of the major television news operations in the country finds that the only one getting a positive review is Fox News. CNN does next best followed by NBC News, then CBS News, and finally ABC News.

49% of Americans say they trust Fox News to 37% who disagree. [link]
They've been trying to tell you all along that they are fair and balanced.  Now the American people back up their claim.

No surprise as far as I'm concerned.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 9 comments
,4:43 AM
The Eminent Domain Travesty Continues
Good God:
Condemnation of couple's property to proceed
By Sarah Bruyn Jones, Roanoke Times

The revelation that Carilion Clinic is not interested in the privately owned property adjacent to its growing medical park won't stop the condemnation of the property.

In a ruling Tuesday, Roanoke Circuit Court Judge William Broadhurst rejected a motion by the lawyer for B&B Holdings LLC and Stephanie and Jay Burkholder to reconsider the condemnation of their Reserve Avenue property.

Joe Waldo, the Burkholders' attorney, argued that the condemnation of the property would create blight instead of eliminating blight. The government is seeking to take the property and use it for economic development.

The Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority's attorney, Mark Loftis, argued that Carilion's lack of interest had no relevance to the issue of determining if the property could be condemned.

Waldo said that by forcing the Burkholders to sell and with no plan in place to develop the land, the property would sit vacant, resulting in a loss of tax revenue and a loss of jobs. Currently the flooring business Surfaces Inc. operates on the site, employs about 10 people and supports about 40 independent subcontractors.

"The property is going to be taken without any useful purpose," Waldo argued during court. Broadhurst sided with the housing authority, noting that the law does not require there to be a specific design in place for the use of a condemned property.

He said even if the new evidence of Carilion's lack of interest presented by B&B was true, it wouldn't have changed his November ruling that the government had the legal authority to condemn the property under Virginia's eminent domain laws. [link]
Unfortunately, that last statement is true.  The government is seizing the Burkholders' property because it can. It has no other reason for doing so - see above.  It simply can. And is.

And that's the problem that should scare every American citizen to death.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 1 comments
,4:38 AM
I Think We All Knew It Would End This Way
Although we hoped against hope:
Remains likely Tech student's
Rex Bowman, Roanoke Times

Charlottesville -- The three-month search for Morgan Harrington ended in a remote hayfield Tuesday when an Albemarle County farmer checking his fences discovered what authorities are confident are the Virginia Tech student's skeletal remains.

How she died, when she died and even where she died are now the questions Virginia State Police are trying to find answers to as they scour the hayfield less than 10 miles south of Charlottesville, where Harrington was last seen alive after disappearing from a rock concert.

While state police are waiting for the medical examiner's office in Richmond to make a definitive identification of the body, the search for Harrington is now a search for her killer. [link]
Find him.  Fry him.  And give him a fair trial.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments
,4:34 AM
It's Going To Require a Newt Gingrich
Because Barack Obama has demonstrated NO willingness to discipline Congress:
Lawmakers give cold shoulder to Obama call for budget freeze
By Walter Alarkon and J. Taylor Rushing, The Hill

President Barack Obama’s proposal to freeze government spending is turning out to be a tough sell on Capitol Hill.

His liberal base warned Tuesday the three-year cap on most non-defense discretionary spending could hamper an economic recovery. Conservatives dismissed it as insufficient and just for show.

Even the bipartisan group of lawmakers who praised Obama’s plan, most of them centrists, questioned whether he has the fortitude to veto plump spending bills that fail to adhere to the limits he has set. They also wonder if he will take further steps to rein in the $12.3 trillion federal debt.

Top Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), offered tepid support for Obama’s plan, saying it wasn’t enough.

“Of course I’m glad, but now there’s got to be spending cuts,” said McCain, who called for a discretionary spending freeze during the 2008 presidential debates. “They’ve added nearly 20 percent in spending in the past year. So a freeze is the right thing to do, but we’ll have to see how it gets implemented.” [link]
The Obama train is hurtling downhill.  And now he says he wants to put on the brakes.  Why don't I believe him?
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,4:24 AM
Voters Become Disillusioned
I guess that's what happens when you wake up from a dream to find ... he is human after all:
One Year Later: The 40-Percent President
By Brad O'Leary, American Thinker

Today, Obama's policies face public approval of around 40% or less. In fact, across the board, from his policies to the candidates he supports, 40% or less of the American public back the Obama brand. As they say, the numbers don't lie.

Voters Running from Obama

* Only 43% of voters say they would vote to reelect Obama. (Zogby poll of 2,377 voters, January 19-21, 2010)

Voters Running from Obama-Backed Candidates

* Only 37% of Americans would vote to reelect their Obama-supported Democratic congressman. (Rasmussen poll of 800 likely voters, November 24, 2009)

Voters Oppose Obama's Health Care Plan

* Only 32% think Obama's health care plan is a good idea. (NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll of 1,008 adults, December 11-14, 2009)

* Only 13% of voters agree with the Obama administration's decision to bar C-SPAN from broadcasting negotiations about his health care bill. (Zogby poll of 2,377 voters, January 19-21, 2010)

* Only 12% of voters agree with the provision in Obama's health care bill that would force some married couples to pay $2,000 more per year for health insurance than unmarried couples. (Zogby poll of 2,377 voters, January 19-21, 2010)

* Only 21% of voters think that taxpayer dollars should be used to fund elective abortions. (Zogby poll of 2,377 voters, January 19-21, 2010) [link]
Sad thing is for Mr. Obama, this is as good as it gets.  From here on in, it's all downhill.

Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person.
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 0 comments
,4:20 AM
Call It Tough Love
Yeah, I know it's not nice ...

... but it is funny.

And there's a point to be made. If they want to succeed here ...
 
posted by Jerry Fuhrman
Permalink ¤ 3 comments